NU 610 Unit 4 Discussion 1 – Scope of Practice: Debate
Scope of Practice: Debate
Nurse practitioners (NPs) play a crucial role in providing patient-centered, cost-effective care in areas where physicians are scarce (Smith, 2021). However, in Florida, NPs face restricted practice laws that limit their ability to provide care independently, despite their advanced education and training. This paper will present an argument in favor of expanding the scope of practice for NPs in Florida, supported by evidence-based reasoning.
Government and Policy Influence
The basis for establishing the scope of practice for NPs is state-level government policies. Restrictive laws in Florida force NPs to continue physician supervision for several services, which adds needless obstacles and delays to patient treatment. These regulations not only put a strain on healthcare systems, but they also stop highly trained professionals from doing their jobs to the fullest. NPs could provide care on their own if their practice were allowed to grow. This would bring regulations in line with data that shows NPs provide safe, effective care that is equivalent to that of primary care physicians (Ryskina et al., 2024). Access would be made easier, costs would go down, and fairness would improve in areas that are not getting enough help.
Role of Professional Organizations
When it comes to influencing healthcare policy and promoting more NP practice, professional associations are crucial. With research proving that NPs can deliver high-quality, cost-effective treatment with results on par with physicians, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) has been leading the push for full practice authority (FPA) across the country (Lavin et al., 2022). In Florida, groups like the Florida Nurse Practitioner Network keep working with lawmakers and other important people to show how rules that make it hard to get care are a problem. Their advocacy focuses on how state restrictions do not align with federal goals to strengthen primary care services. Professional groups, healthcare leaders, and policymakers must collaborate to advance legislative change.
Impact on Healthcare Access and Outcomes
There is considerable promise for improving healthcare outcomes and access by expanding the scope of practice for NPs in Florida. In rural and medically underserved areas, where patients frequently have to wait a long time and have limited access to physicians, provider shortages are particularly acute. Evidence indicates that states with full practice authority report shorter delays for appointments, greater patient satisfaction, and improved chronic disease management (Smith, 2021). Reducing restrictions would also lower healthcare costs by minimizing reliance on physician oversight and unnecessary referrals. Most importantly, expansion would allow NPs to respond effectively to Florida’s diverse population needs, ensuring that equitable, timely, and patient-centered care is consistently available across communities.
Conclusion
It is both evidence-based and essential to broaden NPs’ scope of practice in Florida in order to satisfy the state’s rising healthcare needs. By changing regulations that make it hard for NPs to do their jobs, policymakers can give them more freedom to use all of their training, improve access in areas that need it, and improve patient outcomes. This argument highlights the importance of aligning policies with research to maintain flexible and sustainable healthcare systems.
References
Lavin, R. P., Veenema, T. G., Sasnett, L., Schneider-Firestone, S., Thornton, C. P., Saenz, D., Cobb, S., Shahid, M., Peacock, M., & Couig, M. P. (2022). Analysis of nurse practitioners’ educational preparation, credentialing, and scope of practice in U.S. emergency departments. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 12(4), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(22)00010-2
Ryskina, K. L., Liang, J., Ritter, A. Z., Spetz, J., & Barnes, H. (2024). State scope of practice restrictions and nurse practitioner practice in nursing homes: 2012–2019. Health Affairs Scholar, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae018
Smith, L. B. (2021). The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery. Health Economics, 31(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4438
CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER
Unit 4 Discussion 1 – Scope of Practice: Debate
- Consider the role of government and various professional organizations in the process of planning and implementing policies at management levels for diverse healthcare environments.
Instructions
Nurse Practitioners (NP) are essential healthcare providers, meeting the needs of communities in both rural and urban settings. The scope of practice for NPs varies by state, ranging from the full scope of practice to reduce, or restricted practice. Review the map and associated information below.
- State Practice Environment MapLinks to an external site. (American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2019)
You will argue a viewpoint of this issue. Your personal beliefs may differ, and you will need to use evidence to support your position. You will choose one of the positions below:
Students with last names beginning with A-L – will debate in FAVOR of expanding the scope of practice in the state of Florida.
Students with last names beginning with M-Z – will debate in OPPOSITION of expanding the scope of practice in the state of Florida.
Required action:
- Your first post must be created by 11:59 pm CST Wednesday, and at least two responses posted by 11:59 pm CST Sunday to be eligible for full collaboration points.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.