NRNP 6552 Social Determinants of Health Among the Female Population

Social Determinants of Health among the Female Population

Who is most Affected?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

Just from $7/Page

Order Essay

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the conditions, in which people are born, grow, work, age, and die. It also includes the social systems that influence people’s daily lives, health, and well-being. Women experience a range of SDOH in my community. They include low income, poor access to healthcare, unemployment, educational status, and the environment where women live. SDOH affects women of ethnic minority backgrounds more than it does to those of ethnic majority groups. For example, black women are highly likely to be uninsured when compared to non-Hispanic white women (Yearby, 2020). As a result, they experience significant challenges in accessing the care that they need than non-Hispanic white women.

What Major Challenges Have You Found?

As noted above, the lack of medical insurance among women affects their access to the healthcare services they need for their health and well-being. Women also suffer from low pay as compared to men, as seen from the data that they on average earn 82 cents for a dollar that men make. Women of ethnic minority backgrounds experience worse economic disparities than non-Hispanic women and men (Snyder-Mackler et al., 2020; Yearby, 2020). Women of color also experience discrimination, structural inequality, and systemic racism, which affect their healthcare experiences and cause disparities in health.

What Changes Could You Propose

Several interventions can be adopted to address SDOH in women. Firstly, women can be linked with the existing social resources to help them access the care that they need. Social resources such as community support groups can help them cope with their health challenges. The other way is through community education and involvement in addressing social norms and issues that contribute to the SDOH (Coughlin, 2019). Community education would raise awareness and promote the adoption of interventions that address the challenges.

Risk Assessment Instruments and Potential Health Risks

Some of the risk assessment instruments that would be appropriate for use when assessing women include the Women’s Health Questionnaire, which identifies social, and health risks, and breast cancer assessment for breast cancer. The potential health risks for women include breast cancer, osteoporosis, cervical cancer, and major depression (Crear-Perry et al., 2021).

References

Coughlin, S. S. (2019). Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 177(3), 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05340-7

Crear-Perry, J., Correa-de-Araujo, R., Lewis Johnson, T., McLemore, M. R., Neilson, E., & Wallace, M. (2021). Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health. Journal of Women’s Health, 30(2), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8882

Snyder-Mackler, N., Burger, J. R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D. W., Noppert, G. A., Campos, F. A., Bartolomucci, A., Yang, Y. C., Aiello, A. E., O’Rand, A., Harris, K. M., Shively, C. A., Alberts, S. C., & Tung, J. (2020). Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science, 368(6493), eaax9553. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax9553

Yearby, R. (2020). Structural Racism and Health Disparities: Reconfiguring the Social Determinants of Health Framework to Include the Root Cause. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(3), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520958876

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH AMONG THE FEMALE POPULATION

An individual’s health is influenced by many factors. Nurse Practitioners must be versed in all factors and adept in assessing the impact of economic conditions, education, environment, and social conditions on health.

Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) have a major impact on people’s health, well-being, and quality of life. Examples of SDOH include:

Safe housing, transportation, and neighborhoods
Racism, discrimination, and violence
Education, job opportunities, and income
Access to nutritious foods and physical activity opportunities
Polluted air and water
Language and literacy skills

For this Discussion, you will explore Social Determinants of Health and five areas that are impacted. For your community where you reside, assess these five areas. You will also explore available instruments to complete a full assessment of an individual’s SDOH.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

Who is most affected?
What major challenges have you found?
What changes could you propose?
What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use when assessing your community?
Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the community age groups.

BY DAY 3

Post a brief summary of the findings of the Social Determinants of Health in your community for each of the five areas described above. When providing your summary, take into consideration the preparation questions above and incorporate those into the summary.

References should be used to support your findings.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

BY DAY 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts on two different days and provide additional insight to your colleagues related to issues and topics they may want to also consider. Use the Learning Resources and/or the best available evidence from current literature to support your explanation.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

NRNP_6552_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 to >39.16 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)… Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources… No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

39.16 to >34.76 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)… Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth… Supported by at least 3 credible references.

34.76 to >30.36 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)… One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed… Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

30.36 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)… Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria… Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis… Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module… Contains only 1 or no credible references.

44 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Writing

6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Written clearly and concisely… Contains no grammatical or spelling errors… Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Written concisely… May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors… Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Written somewhat concisely… May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Contains some APA formatting errors.

4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Not written clearly or concisely… Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors… Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Timely and full participation

10 to >8.9 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts main discussion by due date.

8.9 to >7.9 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Posts main discussion by due date… Meets requirements for full participation.

7.9 to >6.9 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts main discussion by due date.

6.9 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post main discussion by due date.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 to >8.01 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings… Responds to questions posed by faculty… The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8.01 to >7.11 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7.11 to >6.21 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6.21 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Writing

6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed… Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources… Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues… Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed… Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources… Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Timely and full participation

5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 to >8.01 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

8.01 to >7.11 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7.11 to >6.21 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6.21 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Writing

6 to >5.34 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

5.34 to >4.74 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

4.74 to >4.14 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication… Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed… Few or no credible sources are cited.

4.14 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication… Response to faculty questions are missing… No credible sources are cited.

6 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Timely and full participation

5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation… Posts by due date.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation… Posts by due date.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation… Does not post by due date.

5 pts

Total Points: 100