My Account

NR 707- Week 3 Professional Poster

NR 707- Week 3 Professional Poster

Week 3 Professional Poster

Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this activity is for students to create a professional poster to disseminate their DNP evidence-based practice change project through a poster presentation at a national conference. This progressive poster assignment begins in NR707 and is completed in NR709.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NR 707- Week 3 Professional Poster
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Instructions

  • Create your poster using the Professional Poster Template located in the Project & Practicum Forms section of the DNP Resources page. Scroll down to select the right poster for this assignment titled: NR 707_DNP Professional Poster Template 6.24.22.
  • Insert your content into the text boxes for each section; make sure to remove the instructions on the template. The content should be well-developed, concisely conveyed, and supported by the evidence. Leave space between each section without words, so that there is a space break between sections.
  • Set up your poster using the following format and guidelines.

 

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

  • Your poster sections are required to have the exact sections and headers as the NR707 Poster template and in the same order. Use the following template headings
    • Practice Problem
    • Practice Question
    • Methodology
    • Results
    • Implications
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • The Results and Conclusion sections should be blank.
  • The poster should convey the practice change project concisely and accurately to enhance reader comprehension.
  • Read the poster from another person’s point of view to ensure that the information you entered describes your practice change project concisely and flows logically.

Include the following in your poster:

  1. Practice Problem
    1. Offer strong evidence-based statements for the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels. If available, include data from the practicum site to support this is a priority problem for the organization.
    2. Include the project aim (main purpose or objective) at the end of this section.
    3. Include in-text citations.
    4. Use bullet points for practice problem data points. Bullet points are not required for project aim.
    5. Use concise and accurate statements.
  2. Practice Question
    1. The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.
    2. Remove the name or identifiers of the practicum site from the practice question and other sections of the poster.
  3. Methodology (Part 1 and Part 2 in the Rubric)
    1. In this section, students who are implementing at the practicum site are required to state the information in short concise phrases with bullet points. Use the exact subheaders listed on the NR 707 poster template.
    2. State the translational science model or theory/change model.
    3. Provide a short description of the setting.
    4. Provide a short description of the population with the estimated number of participants.
    5. Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
    6. Briefly describe the intervention (cite primary source)
    7. Briefly describe the formative evaluation plan.
    8. Briefly describe the summative evaluation plan.
    9. State the main outcome of the PICOT practice question.
    10. Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).
    11. State the name of the data collection instrument (cite source) OR data source (e.g., data extraction from chart or EHR, or data from the quality department, etc.).
    12. State the data analysis plan (descriptive statistics or statistical test if consulting with a statistician).
    13. State the exact timeframe for the total project implementation and the intervention implementation.
  4. Results: (LEAVE BLANK)
  5. Conclusion: (LEAVE BLANK)
  6. Implications for Nursing and Healthcare
    1. Briefly state your anticipated implications for changing patient, nursing practice, and organizational outcomes. The anticipated outcomes should be based on the research supporting your intervention. Implications should be explained for each system level below:
      1. Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)
      2. Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)
      3. Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])
    2. Use a bullet point for each implication.
    3. Do not include the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullet points (cover the concepts)
  7. References: Use of Scientific Evidence
    1. Every reference is required to be associated with an in-text citation.
    2. The poster includes at least three (3) references; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization related to the DNP project in citations and references. Avoid secondary or summary sources.
    3. References must be published in the past 5 years.
    4. References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).

Visual Presentation

Guidelines
Feature Expectation
Writing mechanics and word usage
  • No errors
Poster title
  • 60-72 font size
  • Limited to 12 words or less; all words fully spelled out (no acronyms or abbreviations)
  • Title should be centered and capitalized
Name and credentials
  • 32-36 font size
  • Should not contain “DNP” or “DNP student”
  • Name/credentials should be centered
Headings
  • 32-40 font size
  • Location of headings needs to remain in the exact column of the template provided
Text within each section
  • 24-32 font size; needs to be consistent across the entire poster (can be smaller in the Reference section)
  • Text should not be written outside the poster template
Reference section
  • Font size can be smaller, but still needs to be legible
Font type
  • Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman (legible and consistent throughout each section of the poster)
Spacing
  • Empty space between each section
  • There should be only one space between words
Color
  • Adheres to template provided
Clip art/pictures
  • None
Bullets
  • For all data points in all sections
  • (Exception: No bullet needed for the Aim and the PICOT practice question)

 

 

Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric

Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLayout and OrganizationRequirements:
1. The poster has the exact sections and headers in the exact columns as the template provided and in the same order as below:
-Practice Problem
-Practice Question
-Methodology
-Implications
-Results
-Conclusions
-References
2. The Results and Conclusion sections are blank.
3. The poster conveys the project concisely and accurately.
30 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent layout and organization.

 27 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient layout and organization.

 24 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial layout and organization.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped or poor layout and organization.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual PresentationRequirements:
1. The poster is free of spelling, grammar, spacing, and punctuation errors.
2. The poster title is 60-72 font size; text is centered and capitalized. The title is limited to 12 words or less; all words are fully spelled out (no acronyms or abbreviations.)
3. Name and credentials are 32-36 font size; text is centered.
4. The headings are 32-40 font size.
5. The text in each section is 24-32 font size; and should be consistent across the entire poster (except the Reference section can be smaller).
6. Font type should be Arial, Calibri, or Times New Roman and should be consistent across the entire poster.
7. Font size in Reference section can be smaller than the other sections but needs to be legible.
8. There is an empty space between each section.
9. Colors adhere to the template provided.
10. No clip art or pictures are in the poster.
11. Text is not hanging off the poster template.
12. All instructions on the poster template have been removed.
20 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent visual poster presentation.

 18 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient visual poster presentation.

 16 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial visual poster presentation.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and demonstrates a poor partial visual poster presentation.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice Problem and Project Aim (Purpose)Requirements:
1. Provide the significance data, including prevalence, and/or incidence, and/or mortality data at the national and state (or county or city) levels.
2. Include in-text citation(s).
3. Use bullet points for each entry (except the project aim).
4. Use concise and accurate statements.
5. The project aim is a succinct and complete statement of what the intervention will change- your desired outcome.
30 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all data requirements and provides an in-depth and also concise practice problem section. The project aim statement is concise and robust.

 27 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.

 24 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial discussion of the practice problem and/or the project aim.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped discussion of the practice problem and the project aim.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePractice QuestionRequirements:
1. The practice question must be the exact approved PICOT practice question as identified in the Chamberlain University IRB approval letter.
2. The name or identifiers of the practicum site are removed from the practice question and other sections of the poster.
20 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and includes the practice question from the IRB approval letter.

 18 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient practice question from the IRB approval letter.

 16 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial practice question.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped practice question.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 1Requirements:
1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.
2. State the translational science model or theory/change model.
3. State a short description of the setting.
4. Provide a short description of the population with an estimate of the number of participants.
5. Briefly state the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
6. Briefly describe the intervention (with primary citation).
30 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

 27 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

 24 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology Part 2Requirements:
1. Use the exact bulleted subheaders listed on the NR707 poster template. Complete the content with short, concise phrases.
2. Briefly state the formative evaluation plan.
3. Briefly state the summative evaluation plan.
4. Briefly state the main outcome from the PICOT practice question.
5. Briefly describe the data collection (e.g., pre-intervention and post-intervention data collection).
6. State the name of the data collection instrument (with primary citation) OR data source.
7. Briefly describe the data analysis plan.
8. State the exact timeframe for the total implementation and the intervention implementation.
30 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise methodology section.

 27 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient methodology section.

 24 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial methodology section.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped methodology section.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImplicationsRequirements:
1. Implications should be explained in a brief statement for each system level below.
a. Micro (patient or individual nurse outcomes)
b. Meso (unit or department collective nursing practice)
c. Macro (facility or healthcare system[s])
2. Use a bullet point for each implication.
3. Avoid including the terms Micro, Meso, Macro in the bullets (cover the concepts)
20 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an accurate and concise implications discussion.

 18 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a sufficient implications discussion.

 16 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial implications discussion.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides an undeveloped implications discussion.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesRequirements:
1. Every reference has an in-text citation.
2. At least 3 references are included; research articles (primary research or systematic reviews) or data from a government or nationally-recognized healthcare organization.
3. Summary and secondary sources are avoided.
4. References must be published within the past 5 years.
5. References and in-text citations are required to be in correct APA format, excluding the hanging indent (which PowerPoint may not enable).
20 ptsExcellent or Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides excellent use of scientific evidence and reference section.

 18 ptsGood or High Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides sufficient use of scientific evidence and reference section.

 16 ptsAcceptable or Basic Level of Performance

Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial use of scientific evidence and reference section.

 0 ptsFailing Level of Performance

Provides undeveloped use of scientific evidence and reference section.
20 pts
Total Points: 200

 

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?