My Account

NRNP 6552 WEEK 4 Common Gynecologic Conditions, Part 1

NRNP 6552 WEEK 4 Common Gynecologic Conditions, Part 1

Common Gynecologic Conditions

Case 1: Ann

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP 6552 WEEK 4 Common Gynecologic Conditions, Part 1
Just from $7/Page
Order Essay
Outline Subjective data.

 

 Outline

Objective findings.

 

 Identify diagnostic tests, procedures, and laboratory work indicated.

 

 Distinguish at least three differential diagnoses. Identify appropriate medications, treatments, or other interventions associated with each differential diagnosis. Explain key

Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) for your chosen case.

 Describe collaborative care referrals and patient education needs for your chosen case.
The patient presents with mild lower abdominal pain with substantial vaginal discharge over the past week. The patient has had four sexual partners in the past six months and has a medical history that includes depressive disorders, HSV-2, and a previous surgical abortion. She is now using Loestrin Fe for contraception and has a regular menstrual cycle, with her most recent period happening two weeks prior. Socially, she lives with her parents, refutes drug usage, has completed high school, and is employed as a waitress. Her familial background includes a mother with depression. Further information is required about her sexual activities, the features of her vaginal discharge, specifics about her depression and HSV-2 care, contraception use, and understanding of Pap smears (Dombrowski, 2021). The patient’s vital signs are stable: blood pressure is 112/80 mmHg, pulse is 72 bpm, respiration rate is 16 bpm, temperature is 98.4°F, weight is 110 pounds, height is 54 inches, and BMI is 18.9 kg/m². The overall look is robust and well-fed, with no indications of distress. The abdominal examination indicates a soft, non-tender, and non-distended abdomen, devoid of masses or organ hypertrophy. The gynecological examination reveals no lesions or substantial abnormalities; nonetheless, slight cervical motion pain is seen. Further laboratory tests are required, including NAAT for chlamydia and gonorrhea (Dombrowski, 2021). Debbie’s symptoms and medical history need a thorough evaluation. The Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea is advised for detecting the pathogens responsible for these illnesses. At the same time, wet mount and KOH testing of vaginal discharge may assist in diagnosing bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, along with yeast infections (Dombrowski, 2021). A Pap smear is advised for cervical cancer screening, whereas a PCR test may verify a herpes simplex virus infection in the presence of visible lesions. Pelvic ultrasonography may identify structural abnormalities, ovarian cysts, or other etiologies of abdominal discomfort. A CBC may detect markers of infection or anemia, while a urinalysis can exclude a UTI to distinguish between gynecological and gastrointestinal symptoms. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) endorses these diagnostic tools for women suffering from abdominal pain. Chlamydia Trachomatis is the most frequently identified STD in the US, especially among young people and adolescents who are sexually active (Davidson et al., 2021). Debbie’s symptoms, characterized by mucopurulent cervical discharge and cervical friability, align with a chlamydial infection. The CDC’s STI Treatment Guidelines emphasize the need for screening for chlamydia in sexually active individuals.

Gonorrhea is a prevalent sexually transmitted infection with similar symptoms, and the CDC advises concurrent treatment for chlamydia in those presenting with cervicitis and a history of many sexual partners (Van Ommen et al., 2023). Bacterial

Vaginosis (BV) is the predominant cause of vaginal discharge in women of reproductive age, often presenting as a homogeneous, off-white, thin discharge accompanied by a fishy odor. Debbie’s account of significant vaginal discharge suggests the potential of BV, and ACOG acknowledges its common occurrence and manifestation via discharge, warranting attention even in the absence of typical symptoms.

 For the treatment of Chlamydia Trachomatis infection, patients may administer either 1 g of azithromycin or 100 mg of doxycycline bi-daily for seven days, with a strong focus on completing the whole antibiotic regimen (Davidson et al., 2021). The prescribed therapy for gonorrhea is a single intramuscular dosage of 500 mg of Ceftriaxone for those weighing < 150 kg, accompanied by 1 g of oral azithromycin (Van Ommen et al., 2023). The CDC recommends dual medication to avoid co-infection with chlamydia and address antibiotic resistance. Treatment alternatives for BV are Clindamycin cream 2% administered intravaginally at night for seven days, Metronidazole gel 0.75% applied intravaginally once daily for five days, or Metronidazole 500 mg taken orally twice daily for seven days (Coudray & Madhivanan, 2020). Patients are instructed to refrain from douching and using harsh soaps and to recognize the impact of several sexual partners on vaginal flora and the heightened risk of BV (Chacra et al., 2022). Debbie, a waitress exhibiting signs of an STI, is affected by many SDOH. Her work, education, and socioeconomic level might influence her health literacy, comprehension of health risks, and access to healthcare services. Her little earnings may restrict her capacity to finance routine gynecological examinations, contraceptives, and therapies. Financial constraints may also impede her compliance with treatment protocols and access to therapy. Moreover, her insufficient access to comprehensive sexual education may impair her understanding of STI prevention, contraceptive use, and the need for regular gynecological treatment. Education, cultural norms, and access to resources such as condoms and contraceptive services influence her sexual health practices. Consequently, her health condition, access to healthcare, and possible health outcomes are all affected by these variables (Francisco-Natanauan et al., 2021). A comprehensive strategy that includes targeted patient education and coordinated care referrals is necessary to treat Debbie’s health challenges properly. It is advisable to send her to a gynecologist or an infectious disease expert for accurate diagnosis and treatment of suspected STIs and comprehensive gynecological evaluations. Furthermore, considering her history of depression, a referral to mental health services is essential for managing her emotional well-being, perhaps improving her receptiveness to medical counsel. Social services may address socioeconomic obstacles, while a patient navigator can facilitate access to essential resources. Additionally, Debbie necessitates instruction on sexual health, encompassing safe sex practices and the relevance of STI screening, along with comprehensive details about her treatment strategy and the essential of follow-up care to ensure efficient infection resolution and avert problems (Francisco-Natanauan et al., 2021).

 

 

 

References

Chacra, L. A., Fenollar, F., & Diop, K. (2022). Bacterial vaginosis: What do we currently know? Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.672429

Coudray, M. S., & Madhivanan, P. (2020). Bacterial vaginosis—A brief synopsis of the literature. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 245, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.035

Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, C. M., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., Krist, A. H., Kubik, M., Li, L., Ogedegbe, G., Pbert, L., Silverstein, M., Simon, M. A., Stevermer, J., Tseng, C., & Wong, J. B. (2021). Screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea. JAMA, 326(10), 949. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.14081

Dombrowski, J. C. (2021). Chlamydia and gonorrhea. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(10), ITC145–ITC160. https://doi.org/10.7326/aitc202110190

Francisco-Natanauan, P., Leatherman-Arkus, N., & Pantell, R. H. (2021). Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Prevalence and treatment in Detained Youths: Strategies for improvement. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.09.041

Van Ommen, C. E., Malleson, S., & Grennan, T. (2023). A practical approach to the diagnosis and management of chlamydia and gonorrhea. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 195(24), E844–E849. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.221849

 

 

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Common Gynecologic Conditions, Part 1

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will once again choose 1 of 4 case study scenarios and review the case study scenario to obtain information related to a gynecologic exam and determine differential diagnoses, diagnostics, and develop treatment and management plans.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Schuiling, K. D., & Likis, F. E. (2022). Gynecologic health care (4th ed.). Jones and Bartlett Learning.
    • Chapter 17, “Breast Conditions” (pp. 337-349)
    • Chapter 18, “Alterations in Sexual Function” (pp. 353-364)
    • Chapter 20, “Infertility” (pp. 383-398)
    • Chapter 21, “Gynecologic Infections” (pp. 401-432)
    • Chapter 22, “Sexually Transmitted Infections” (pp. 437-466)

Clinical Guideline Resources

As you review the following resources, you may want to include a topic in the search area to gather detailed information (e.g., breast cancer screening guidelines; for CDC – zika in pregnancy).

Required Media

Optional Resources

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

To prepare:

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will choose 1 of 4 case study scenarios.
  • Review the Learning Resources for this week and specifically review the clinical guideline resources specific to your chosen case study.
  • Use the Case Study Assignment Template found in the Learning Resources to support your assignment.

By Day 5 of Week 4

Submit your case study assignment by Day 5 of Week 4.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as Wk4Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week4_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week4_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.
30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent

The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

 26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood

The response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

The response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

The response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.
30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent

The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

 26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood

The response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

The response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.

 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

The response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.
30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent

Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

 26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood

Formulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

 23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

Formulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

 20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

Formulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

 3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

 3.45 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

 

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAMS. Chat with a support agent for more information

CHAT US NOW
X
Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?