NRNP-6552 Week 8 Common Health Conditions with Implications for Women

NRNP-6552 Week 8 Common Health Conditions with Implications for Women

  • Case 3
Outline Subjective data.

 

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP-6552 Week 8 Common Health Conditions with Implications for Women
Just from $7/Page
Order Essay

Identify data provided in your chosen case and any additional data needed.

Outline

Objective findings.

 

Identify findings provided in your chosen case and any additional data needed.

Identify diagnostic tests, procedures, laboratory work indicated.

 

Describe the rationalefor each test or intervention with supporting references.

Distinguish at least three differential diagnoses.

 

Describethe rationales for your choice of each diagnosis with supporting references.

Identify appropriate medications, treatments or other interventions associated with each differential diagnosis.

 

Describe rationales and supporting references for each.

 

Explain key

Social Determinants of Heath (SDoH) for your chosen case.

Describe collaborative care referrals and patient education needs for your chosen case.

 

Describe rationales and supporting references for each.

 

·         A 36-year-old Hispanic female gravida 2 para 1 at 24-week gestation visits the clinic worried about weight gain.

·         She delivered a 9 lbs viable male infant via spontaneous vaginal delivery in her first pregnancy after 10 hours of labor.

·         She denied any complications during the pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum.

·         There is a family history of diabetes in the paternalgrandfather and aunt and obesity in both parents.

 

Other additional information, I would also wish to know:

1.      If the patient has been experiencing polydipsia, excessive thirst, or polyuria.

2.      If the patient has had any prior diabetes mellitus screening (Sharma et al., 2022).

3.      If there was history of gestational diabetes mellitus in the first pregnancy.

4.      The gestation age at delivery in her first pregnancy.

·         Vitals: sitting BP of140/84 and HR-92/min

·         Height-5’2”, Weight-170 lbs, and BMI-31.1.

·         Head and ENT examination had normal findings.

·         Supple neck without adenopathy and thyromegaly.

·         The lungs were eupneic and clear on auscultation bilaterally.

·         The CVS exam had RRR, soft systolic murmur Grade II/VI, no rubs noted, 2+ peripheral pulses, and no edema noted

·         The breasts were soft and had fibrocystic changes bilaterally but had no masses, dimpling, discharge, redness, or inflammation

·         An abdominal examination revealed uterine fundal height size of approximately 24 weeks’ gestation that is non-tender.

·         Fetal heart tones were present on auscultation with Doppler.

·         An Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): the test is done between the 24th and 28th weeks of pregnancy to diagnose gestational diabetes. (Moon et al., 2021).

·         HbA1C levels to determine the patient’s prognosis.

·         Urinalysis to determine whether there are any proteins and pus cells in urine. This crucial in diagnosis of proteinuria and urinary tract infections in the current pregnancy (Nakshine et al., 2023).

·         Repeat blood pressure (BP) measurements after four hours to determine whether she is hypertensive as her previous BP reading was elevated (Chang et al., 2023).

·         Obstetric ultrasound to assess for placentation, fetal growth, anomalies, and placental blood flow.

·         Basic metabolic panel and liver function tests to detect renal and liver function and electrolyte abnormalities in a setting of underlying undiagnosed hypertension (Chang et al., 2023).

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

·         GDM is a condition characterized by insulin resistance due to placental hormones, resulting in glucose intolerance and hyperglycemia (Nakshine et al., 2023).

·         GDM is diagnosed following a positive OGTT test done  between the 24th and 28th week of gestation.

·         GDM risk factors in this patient include obesity, uncontrolled weight gain, family history of diabetes, and previous history of delivery of a large for gestation age neonate (Sharma et al., 2022)

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)

·         An underlying undiagnosed T2DM is a possible diagnosis for the patient.

·         The risk factors for this patient include obesity, and a positive family history of diabetes (Raets et al., 2023).

Hypertensive disease in pregnancy

·         The patient has a sitting blood pressure of 140/84 mmHg.which is slightly elevated for a normal pregnancy at the second trimester.

·         An advanced maternal age, obesity, and an underlying diabetes mellitus also predispose the patient to hypertensive conditions, such as preeclampsia and gestational hypertension (Chang et al., 2023).

GDM and T2DM

·         I would encourage weight loss measures, including regular exercise.

·         I would also offer nutritional advise where I would encourage the patient to take nutritious foods low in processed carbohydrates and sugar to ensure sugar control (Mukherjee et al., 2022).

·         I would also prescribe insulin 10 units subcutaneously OD.

·         I would also encourage regular blood sugar monitoring.

 

Hypertension

·         I would prescribe nifedipine 20 mg PO BD (Chang et al., 2022).

·         I would encourage weight loss, exercise, and nutritious diets.

·         I would also advise have regular BP monitoring.

 

 

For either:

·         I would encourage the patient to perform a non-stress test at the third trimester(Chahed et al., 2022).

 

·         Access to quality healthcare services and health education are examples of SDOH that may affect the patient.

·         Another key SDOH that is crucial in this patient is economic stability as management of GDM requires financial incentives due to the number of tests, follow-up visits, and medications required (Roustaei et al., 2023).

·         If either of the SDOH are inadequate, the patient is at risk of poor health outcomes due to the associated complications.

·         Maternal complications include: diabetic ketoacidosis, recurrent UTIs and vaginal fungal infections, neuropathies, preeclampsia, polyhydramnios, retinopathies, and nephropathy (Ye et al., 2022).

·         Neonatal and fetal complications includestill birth, neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, hypothermia, jaundice, respiratory distress, and prematurity.

·         The patients are also at risk of developing overt type 2 diabetes if the blood glucose levels are poorly controlled and insulin resistance persists (Raets et al., 2023).

1.      Endocrinologist

The referral is crucial to help tailor the patient’s treatment, including medicationsto meet the needs (Mukherjee et al., 2022).

 

2.      Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) Specialist

·         The referral allows close monitoring of the patient and her unborn child to minimize complications due to hyperglycemia or hypertension such as still birth (Sweeting et al., 2022).

·         In addition, the MFM can also perform specific tests, including non-stress test, Doppler ultrasound studies, and fetal growth monitoring, crucial in high-risk pregnancies.

·         They can also help plan for delivery of the neonate.

 

3.      Nutritionist

·         The referral is crucial for nutritional advise to empower the patient with appropriate diets she can take that would help in sugar control and weight loss (Mukherjee et al., 2022).

 

Patient Education

·         I would advise the patient on the importance on controlled blood sugars. As a result, I would advise her on weight loss, exercise, healthy diets, and medication adherence (Chahed et al., 2022).

·         I would also encourage the patient to have regular follow-up visits for close monitoring and inform her of certain pregnancy warning symptoms, such as vaginal bleeding, drainage of amniotic fluid, lower abdominal pains, and reduced or absent fetal movements.

·         I would also adviseher on the importance of regular blood sugar testing and recording for monitoring purposes.

 

References

Chahed, S., Lassouad, L., Dardouri, M., Mtiraoui, A., Maaroufi, A., &Khairi, H. (2022). Impact of a tailored-care education programme on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. The Pan African Medical Journal, 43. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.128.34084

Chang, J., Seow, M., & Chen, H. (2023). Preeclampsia: Recent Advances in Predicting, Preventing, and Managing the Maternal and Fetal Life-Threatening Condition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042994

Moon, J. H., & Jang, H. C. (2021). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic Approaches and Maternal-Offspring Complications. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, 46(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2021.0335

Mukherjee, S. M., & Dawson, A. (2022). Diabetes: How to manage gestational diabetes mellitus. Drugs in Context, 11. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2021-9-12

Nakshine, V. S., &Jogdand, S. D. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Impacts on Maternal Health, Fetal Development, Childhood Outcomes, and Long-Term Treatment Strategies. Cureus, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.47500

Raets, L., Ingelbrecht, A., &Benhalima, K. (2023). Management of type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: A narrative review. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1193271

Roustaei, Z., Anttonen, S., Räisänen, S., Gissler, M., &Heinonen, S. (2023). Socioeconomic status, maternal risk factors, and gestational diabetes mellitus across reproductive years: A Finnish register-based study. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003278

Sharma, A. K., Singh, S., Singh, H., Mahajan, D., Kolli, P., Mandadapu, G., Kumar, B., Kumar, D., Kumar, S., & Jena, M. K. (2022). Deep Insight of the Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Cells, 11(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11172672

Sweeting, A., Wong, J., Murphy, H. R., & Ross, G. P. (2022). A Clinical Update on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Endocrine Reviews, 43(5), 763-793. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac003

Ye, W., Luo, C., Huang, J., Li, C., Liu, Z., & Liu, F. (2022). Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. The BMJ, 377. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Common Health Conditions with Implications for Women

Case studies provide the opportunity to simulate realistic scenarios involving patients presenting with various health problems or symptoms. Such case studies enable nurse learners to apply concepts, lessons, and critical thinking to interviewing, screening, and diagnostic approaches, as well as to the development of treatment plans.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will chose from four case studies to identify common health implications for women. You will then explore the chosen case study to determine the diagnosis, diagnostic tests, and treatment options for the patient.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

General Guidelines for Health Screenings

FNP Resources

Geriatric Resources

Required Media

  • Common Health Conditions
    Dr. Anne Salomone reviews and discusses the topics found in Weeks 7 & 8 (40 mins).

Optional Resources

Note: In Weeks 1-10, these resources are optional for your review. In Week 11, you will be required to review each of the PowerPoint slides from the text Gynecologic Health Care (4th ed.).

To prepare:

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will chose one of the four scenarios for this assignment.
  • Review the Learning Resources for this week.
  • Use the Assignment Template found in the Learning Resources to complete your assignment.

By Day 5 of Week 8

Submit your case study assignment by Day 5 of Week 8.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as Wk8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6552_Week8_Case_Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzes subjective and objective data and outlines applicable diagnostic tests related to case studies.
30 to >26.7 ptsExcellent

The response provides clear, complete, and comprehensive descriptions of subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining all diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

26.7 to >23.7 ptsGood

The response provides clear, complete partial descriptions of the components of the subjective and objective case data, appropriately outlining most of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

The response provides some components of the subjective and objective case data, but they are incomplete, vague or inaccurate, outlining some of the diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

The response provides unclear or incomplete components of subjective and objective case data. The diagnostic tests, clinical procedures and pharmacological interventions are missing, incorrect, or inappropriately applied.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifies differential diagnoses related to case studies.
30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent

The response contains at least 3 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood

The response contains at least 2 differential diagnoses relevant and applicable to the case.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

The response contains at least 1 differential diagnosis relevant and applicable to the case.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

The response contains few or no differential diagnoses and/or diagnoses are not relevant and applicable to the case.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormulates a treatment plan related to case studies based on scientific rationale, evidence- based standards of care, and practice guidelines. Integrates ethical, psychological, physical, financial issues and Social Determinants of Health in plan.
30 to >26.76 ptsExcellent

Formulates a thorough treatment plan including explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Fully incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources, with no less than 75% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

26.76 to >23.7 ptsGood

Formulates a partially complete treatment plan including partial explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Somewhat incorporates syntheses representative of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources with no less than 50% of the treatment plan having exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least 3 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

23.7 to >20.7 ptsFair

Formulates a minimally complete treatment plan including incomplete or vague explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options. Lacking in synthesis of knowledge gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least 2 current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

20.7 to >0 ptsPoor

Formulates a treatment plan that contains incomplete explanations of appropriate diagnostic tests and treatment options and/ or explanations are missing. Lacks synthesis gained from the resources for the module and current credible sources. Supported by 1 or no current peer- reviewed, references or professional practice guidelines.

30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.45 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4.45 to >3.95 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.95 to >3.45 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3.45 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext

 

Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAMS. Chat with a support agent for more information

X
Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?