NRNP 6675 Week10 Assignment: National Organization Of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies

NRNP 6675 Week10 Assignment: National Organization Of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies

The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has developed nine core competencies to guide NPs acquire the needed professional skills. These core competencies are connected with all NP specializations and the population of focus. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the program has prepared me to meet the NONPF competencies, taking part in social change and advocacy activities in Colorado.

Scientific Foundations: The program has equipped me with ample knowledge in medical sciences, which is fundamental in building a strong scientific foundation. I have learned about psychiatric clinical practice guidelines, evidence-based practice, treatment of vulnerable and diverse patient populations, and translational research (Chan et al., 2020).

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP 6675 Week10 Assignment: National Organization Of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Leadership: The program has prepared me on advocacy, professional accountability, and scholarship (Chan et al., 2020). I have learned about the NP scope of practice and standards of practice, which I should be well-versed with as a PMHNP to lead interdisciplinary healthcare teams.

Quality: The program has prepared me with knowledge and skills that I can employ to access and use information databases and analytically evaluate research findings. I have learned to apply current research findings to clinical practice and evaluate the complex relationships between healthcare cost, access, safety, and quality.

Practice Inquiry: The program has prepared me with research skills that I can apply to identify relevant research data and translate it into practice. I have acquired critical thinking skills to identify how I can utilize research data to better the effectiveness of clinical standards or change current guidelines to improve patient outcomes (Chan et al., 2020).

Technology and Information Literacy: The program has prepared me with information technology skills that I will incorporate into NP practice to improve care delivery. I can effectively use new healthcare technology to promote efficient and effective patient care delivery and improve outcomes.

Policy: The program has prepared me to develop health policies, assess the cross-disciplinary effect of policy, and analyze the influence of globalization on healthcare policy. I have learned the various strategies that I can employ in practice to campaign for policies that will improve healthcare delivery and access to care (Chan et al., 2020).

Health Delivery System: The program has prepared me to integrate knowledge of organizations and systems and employ negotiation and relationship-building skills to improve healthcare. I have learned to analyze the impact of the healthcare system on stakeholders and examine organizational structures and resource allocation.

Ethics: The program has prepared me with skills to solve ethical dilemmas by applying ethics in decision-making. I have learned to examine the ethical effect of clinical decisions and the ethical complexities in healthcare delivery (Chan et al., 2020).

Independent Practice: The program has adequately prepared me with the knowledge and skills to practice independently as a PMHNP. This will be vital in my future PMHNP practice where I will be expected to provide mental health care to patients across the lifespan.

Engaging In Social Change in My Community as a Nurse Practitioner

In my future NP practice, I will engage in social change by advocating for healthcare policies that will improve access to healthcare and outcomes for the community. I will identify gaps in healthcare access and delivery and propose policies to legislators to bridge these gaps (Russell, 2020). I will also participate in community health outreach programs and educate community members to modify lifestyle practices to improve health outcomes.

Legislative/Advocacy Activities in Colorado

The Colorado Nurses Association (CNA) has been on the frontline to advocate for policies against workplace violence (WPV). CNA has advocated for the implementation of WPV training for the healthcare staff that comprises de-escalation skills, violent person/aggression management, resiliency development, and self-defense techniques (CNA, n.d.). It advocates for organizations to develop and adhere to clear and consistent WPV policies and obtain support from leadership at every level.

Conclusion

The program has adequately prepared me with the knowledge and skills to meet the nine NONPF competencies. I will apply these competencies in my future practice to improve care delivery and patient outcomes. I will participate in community social change by identifying gaps in existing policies and advocating for policies that will improve delivery and access to healthcare.

References

Chan, T. E., Lockhart, J. S., Thomas, A., Kronk, R., & Schreiber, J. B. (2020). An integrative review of nurse practitioner practice and its relationship to the core competencies. Journal of Professional Nursing36(4), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.11.003

Colorado Nurses Association. (n.d.). Nursing legislation & advocacy. Home. https://cna.memberclicks.net/advocacy1

Russell, N. (2020). America Needs Nurse Practitioners to Advocate for Social Justice. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners: JNP16(9), 710–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.06.024

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONER FACULTIES (NONPF) COMPETENCIES

The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course was designed to prepare you to synthesize knowledge gained throughout the program and to apply each of the nine core competencies within your selected areas of practice and your representative communities.

The nine areas of competency are:

  • Scientific Foundations
  • Leadership
  • Quality
  • Practice Inquiry
  • Technology and Information Literacy
  • Policy
  • Health Delivery System
  • Ethics
  • Independent Practice

TO PREPARE

Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the NONPF Core Competencies Content.

THE ASSIGNMENT

For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Then, propose how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Finally, describe 1–2 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved. Be specific and provide examples.

NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric

NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFor each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).
55 to >49.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

49 to >43.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.

43 to >38.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.

38 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.

55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePropose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.

6 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains 3-4 APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?