NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection

My presentation attracted the attention of nursing staff, physicians, administrators, and patient safety officers at my practicum site. According to the proposal, nursing staff were responsible for implementing the rounding protocol (Considine et al., 2023). On the other hand, physicians were obligated to provide medical oversight and motivation to the nursing staff. In addition, administrators oversaw the allocation and integration of essential resources while patient safety officers monitored and assessed the program’s efficacy.

I kept my language professional and straightforward during my presentation so the audience could comprehend. The three main components of my presentation were the clinical problem statement, proposal objective, and implementation strategy (López-Soto et al., 2023). This framework ensured that the audience could follow along comfortably and helped to disseminate key points from the proposal.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection

Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

The audience responded well to the proposal, with some individuals even appreciating the effort put into it, given its detailing and importance. However, some questions were noted concerning the pragmatism of the implementation plan, majorly around questions like when precisely the personnel training is and what resources are to be involved in enforcement. Some concerns noted were the need to assess and use the results of the pilot to try and improve the process before its adoption (Hakvoort et al., 2021). The audience’s awareness of falls and their preconceived notions about the impact of hourly rounding could have influenced the presentation.

My professional practice will be significantly influenced by this experience of working in interdisciplinary teams. Presenting to a diverse group of healthcare professionals emphasized the value of fluent, cross-disciplinary communication. Hakvoort et al. (2021) emphasize the significance of evidence-based practice and the need to ensure that clinical decisions are supported by rigorous research. Thanks to this experience, I now have a much better understanding of the mindset and goals of stakeholders. These insights will guide my future healthcare endeavors, highlighting the significance of teamwork and collaboration in achieving positive outcomes.

References

Considine, J., Berry, D., Mullen, M., Edmore Chisango, Melinda Webb-St Mart, Michell, P., Peteris Darzins, & Boyd, L. (2023). Nurses’ experiences of using falls alarms in subacute care: A qualitative study. Plos One, 18(6), e0287537–e0287537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287537

Hakvoort, L., Dikken, J., van der Wel, M., Derks, C., & Schuurmans, M. (2021). Minimizing the knowledge-to-action gap; identifying interventions to change nurses’ behavior regarding fall prevention, a mixed method study. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00598-z

López-Soto, P. J., Rodríguez-Cortés, F. J., María, R., Medina-Valverde, M. J., Rocío Segura-Ruiz, Hidalgo-Lopezosa, P., Manfredini, R., María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego, María Ángeles Ramírez-Pérez, Maria, Francisco Javier Márquez-Cuenca, María Dolores Garrido-Ramiro, Vicente-Fenoy, C., & Juan. (2023). CHRONOFALLS: A multicentre nurse-led intervention in the chronoprevention of in-hospital falls in adults. 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01322-9

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the dissemination of the Capstone Project Change Proposal PowerPoint developed in Topic 9 and presented this week.

Present the PowerPoint you created in Topic 9 to a group of relevant interdisciplinary leaders or stakeholders at your practicum site.

After presenting your PowerPoint, write a 250-500-word reflection that includes the following:

Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation and their role related to the proposed project.
Describe two ways in which you communicated professionally during your presentation.
Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation. Identify any biases that might have affected your presentation of your project.
Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

6.4: Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.4, 9.2, 10.2

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total10 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Audience Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project.	0 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing.	1.5 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.58 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail.	1.78 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed.	2 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough.
Professional Communication Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation.	0 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing.	1.88 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.98 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail.	2.23 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed.	2.5 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough.
Feedback and Biases (B) (B) Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. (C6.4)	0 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing.	1.88 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.98 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail.	2.23 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed.	2.5 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough.
Interprofessional Collaboration (B) (B) Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. (C6.4)	0 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing.	1.5 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.58 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail.	1.78 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed.	2 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	0.75 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	0.79 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	0.89 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	1 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Audience

Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project.

0 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing.

1.5 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.58 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail.

1.78 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed.

2 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough.

Professional Communication

Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation.

0 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing.

1.88 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.98 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail.

2.23 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed.

2.5 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough.

Feedback and Biases (B) (B)

Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. (C6.4)

0 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing.

1.88 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.98 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail.

2.23 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed.

2.5 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough.

Interprofessional Collaboration (B) (B)

Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. (C6.4)

0 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing.

1.5 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.58 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail.

1.78 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed.

2 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

0.79 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

0.89 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

1 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.