NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the dissemination of the Capstone Project Change Proposal PowerPoint developed in Topic 9 and presented this week.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

NRS 465 Week 10 Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection

Just from $13/Page

Order Essay

Present the PowerPoint you created in Topic 9 to a group of relevant interdisciplinary leaders or stakeholders at your practicum site.

After presenting your PowerPoint, write a 250-500-word reflection that includes the following:

Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation and their role related to the proposed project.
Describe two ways in which you communicated professionally during your presentation.
Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation. Identify any biases that might have affected your presentation of your project.
Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

RN-BSN

6.4: Work with other professions to maintain a climate of mutual learning, respect, and shared values.

American Association of Colleges of Nursing Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

This assignment aligns to AACN Core Competencies 6.4, 9.2, 10.2

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Capstone Project Change Proposal Dissemination and Reflection – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total10 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Insufficient	3. Approaching	4. Acceptable	5. Target
Audience Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project.	0 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing.	1.5 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.58 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail.	1.78 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed.	2 points A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough.
Professional Communication Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation.	0 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing.	1.88 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.98 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail.	2.23 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed.	2.5 points A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough.
Feedback and Biases (B) (B) Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. (C6.4)	0 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing.	1.88 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.98 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail.	2.23 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed.	2.5 points A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough.
Interprofessional Collaboration (B) (B) Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. (C6.4)	0 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing.	1.5 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate.	1.58 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail.	1.78 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed.	2 points A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.	0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.	0.75 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.	0.79 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.	0.89 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.	1 points No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Audience

Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project.

0 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is missing.

1.5 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.58 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is present but lacks detail.

1.78 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is mostly detailed.

2 points

A description of who was part of the audience for your presentation, including their role related to the proposed project, is thorough.

Professional Communication

Describe two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation.

0 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is missing.

1.88 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.98 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is present but lacks detail.

2.23 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is mostly detailed.

2.5 points

A description of two ways you communicated professionally during your presentation is thorough.

Feedback and Biases (B) (B)

Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation. (C6.4)

0 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is missing.

1.88 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.98 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is present but lacks detail.

2.23 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is mostly detailed.

2.5 points

A discussion of the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation, including any biases that may have affected the presentation, is thorough.

Interprofessional Collaboration (B) (B)

Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future. (C6.4)

0 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is missing.

1.5 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is incomplete or inaccurate.

1.58 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is present but lacks detail.

1.78 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is mostly detailed.

2 points

A description of how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future is thorough.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

0.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

0.79 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

0.89 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

1 points

No mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.