NUR 505 Module 2 Discussion: Caring for American Eskimo, Japanese, & Russian Populations

Module 2 Discussion

Caring for American Eskimo, Japanese, & Russian Populations

After studying Module 3: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on

NUR 505 Module 2 Discussion: Caring for American Eskimo, Japanese, & Russian Populations

Just from $7/Page

Order Essay

List factors that predispose Eskimos to risk as a result of the consumption of large quantities of sugar.
Analyze different strategies useful in communicating with the Japanese American family.
When caring for a Russian American client, for the most part, at what distance would a Russian patient feel at most ease?

Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Grading Rubric

Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric, which is found by clicking the three dots in the upper right-hand corner and selecting “show rubric” from the menu.

Discussion Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts

5 to >4.0 ptsDistinguished

Identifies and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.

4 to >3.0 ptsExcellent

Identifies and demonstrates an accomplished understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.

3 to >0.0 ptsFair

Identifies and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts.

0 ptsPoor

Identifies and demonstrates an unacceptable understanding of most issues, problems, and concepts. Or nothing was posted.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

3 ptsDistinguished

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

2 ptsExcellent

Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.

1 ptsFair

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

0 ptsPoor

Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. Or nothing was posted.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Peer Responses

2 ptsDistinguished

Constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal to each.

1 ptsFair

Constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded, or provided a rebuttal.

0 ptsPoor

Provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 pts

Total Points: 10