NUR 590 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness
Nurses are responsible for improved health outcomes for patients and diverse population groups. Achieving this critical objective necessitates evidence-based practice (EBP), where nurses implement projects supported by scientific evidence. Before engaging in practice change, nurses should assess the organizational culture and readiness for change. This assessment is vital since leadership, attitude, resources, and other factors determine critical aspects, including stakeholder support, participation of nursing teams, and implementation timelines. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the culture and level of organizational readiness for change in the present organization where the evidence-based practice project is proposed.
Organizational Culture and Degree to Which Culture Supports Change
Organizational culture affects nurses’ behaviors and how they approach patient care. Ghiasi et al. (2022) described organizational culture as the shared norms or ideas that an organization develops in response to internal and external problems. These norms are institutionalized by teaching employees how the organization expects them to think and act. A critical analysis of the organization’s leadership, values, and internal relationships depicts a clan culture. Within nursing, a clan culture’s primary attributes include high internal focus and flexibility (Ghiasi et al., 2022). Such a culture supports change to a significant degree since it is people-centered and flexible, and the nursing environment management is characterized by employee participation and teamwork. Leaders are also friendly and encourage change. Although the structure is hierarchical, the present leadership promotes interprofessional collaboration to achieve patient-centered, high-quality care in safe environments. The primary mission is value-based care centered on high patient satisfaction and healthy patient-provider interactions. Open and respectful communication is highly encouraged, and the employees perceive the organization positively.
Organizational Readiness Tool and Readiness Assessment
Organizational readiness for change is a critical success factor in EBP implementation. Vax et al. (2021) described readiness as stakeholders’ willingness and perceived capacity to adopt a new practice in an organization. Therefore, high readiness implies a proportional adoption rate of evidence-based projects for improved health outcomes. The readiness assessment using the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (ORCA) tool revealed that the current setting is ready for change due to how leaders perceive and support change, facilitation, and the overall organizational context. The ORCA tool assesses readiness from three dimensions: evidence, context, and facilitation (Kononowech et al., 2021). A successful project should be supported by solid evidence, and the organizational culture and leadership should embrace new interventions. Facilitation is primarily about the organization’s capacity to help people change their behaviors to embrace innovation (Kononowech et al., 2021). The survey results (92.8%) indicate a high likelihood of a successful project (Appendix A).
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Strategies to Facilitate Organizational Readiness
Multiple strategies can be used independently or jointly to facilitate the organization’s readiness. They include fostering a culture of innovation and teamwork and addressing staff well-being concerns. O’Hara et al. (2022) found that a culture of innovation is essential to improving healthcare quality and safety through action plans that accelerate new methods. Teamwork encourages diverse nursing professionals to collaborate and address current issues through evidence-based interventions. According to Pomare et al. (2020), change readiness is proportional to staff well-being. Therefore, addressing it improves job satisfaction and the psychological impact of organizational change.
Organizational Culture in Evidence-Based Practice Change
The organization’s clan culture will fully support and sustain an evidence-based practice change. This culture encourages organizational change driven by teamwork and employee engagement (Ghiasi et al., 2022). Although it creates a sense of community, such a culture could slow decision-making since it values diverse opinions from team members. Potential barriers include the availability of nursing teams to offer human support due to their busy schedules. Stakeholder support is predicted to be high since the project is results-oriented regarding patient care. The timing is also appropriate and does not rely on considerable resource facilitation.
Health Care Process and Systems Recommended for Improving Quality, Safety, Cost-Effectiveness
Processes to improve quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness include scaling up knowledge translation, providing virtual care, and health education programs (Hill et al., 2020; Haleem et al., 2021). Such interventions help to reduce healthcare costs while improving access and health knowledge. Technological systems to support telehealth/telemedicine and data-driven practice are essential for better quality and safety (Haleem et al., 2021). Their role is to reduce medical errors, enhance efficiency, and ensure accurate, timely patient care.
Stakeholders and Team Members Needed
The proposed EBP project recommends weekly exercises for older adults with type 2 diabetes. Stakeholders include the organizational leadership, policymakers, nursing professionals, and patients since the project affects them directly (Triplett et al., 2022). Team members include colleagues and family members. The organizational leaders’ primary mandate is to support the project through approval, essential resources, and informed guidance. Nursing colleagues and family members will guide and support patients in implementing the weekly exercise program, evaluate outcomes, and report progress.
Information and Communication Technologies Needed for Implementation
Essential information and communication technologies for the proposed project include wearables, diabetes monitoring tools, and smartphones for recording and reporting health data. The internal stakeholders will integrate them into the setting through information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure that remotely allows data/information exchange. In this case, the implementation team will observe patients remotely and guide them as health data necessitates. The recommended technologies seek to enable older adults with type 2 diabetes to improve functional fitness and independence. Therefore, they will improve nursing practice by preventing issues associated with functional decline at this critical age, mainly falls, increased clinical visits, and poor mental health (Cui et al., 2023). Such outcomes indicate improved care delivery for individuals and populations since they are associated with healthy and productive living and more independence.
Conclusion
Nurses improve health outcomes by identifying clinical issues and responding by implementing evidence-based interventions. A culture ready for EBP is crucial for successfully implementing evidence-based projects. The organization’s clan culture fosters teamwork and encourages innovation. Besides, the ORCA tool reveals substantial evidence backing the project, high facilitation, and an organizational context supporting change.
References
Cui, Y., Liu, B., Qin, M. Z., Liu, Q., Ye, H., & Zhou, J. (2023). Effects of early mental state changes on physical functions in elderly patients with a history of falls. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1), 564. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04274-6
Ghiasi, A., Lord, J., Banaszak-Holl, J., Davlyatov, G., Hearld, L., & Weech-Maldonado, R. (2022). Organizational culture and high Medicaid nursing homes financial performance. Journal of Long-Term Care, (2022), 142–153. https://doi. org/10.31389/jltc.115
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021). Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sensors International, 2, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117
Hill, J. E., Stephani, A. M., Sapple, P., & Clegg, A. J. (2020). The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 15, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2
Kononowech, J., Hagedorn, H., Hall, C., Helfrich, C. D., Lambert-Kerzner, A. C., Miller, S. C., Sales, A. E., & Damschroder, L. (2021). Mapping the organizational readiness to change assessment to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00121-0
O’Hara, S., Ackerman, M. H., Raderstorf, T., Kilbridge, J. F., & Melnyk, B. M. (2022). Building and sustaining a culture of innovation in nursing academics, research, policy, and practice: Outcomes of the National Innovation Summit. Journal of Professional Nursing, 43, 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.08.001
Pomare, C., Ellis, L. A., Long, J. C., Churruca, K., Tran, Y., & Braithwaite, J. (2020). “Are you ready?” Validation of the Hospital Change Readiness (HCR) Questionnaire. BMJ Open, 10(8), e037611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037611
Triplett, N. S., Woodard, G. S., Johnson, C., Nguyen, J. K., AlRasheed, R., Song, F., Stoddard, S., Mugisha, J. C., Sievert, K., & Dorsey, S. (2022). Stakeholder engagement to inform evidence-based treatment implementation for children’s mental health: a scoping review. Implementation Science Communications, 3(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00327-w
Vax, S., Farkas, M., Russinova, Z., Mueser, K. T., & Drainoni, M. L. (2021). Enhancing organizational readiness for implementation: Constructing a typology of readiness-development strategies using a modified Delphi process. Implementation Science: IS, 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01132-0
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Assessment Description
In order to successfully implement a change within an organization, the change agent must assess the organization’s culture and readiness for change.
In 750-1,000 words, analyze the culture and level of readiness of the organization for which your evidence-based practice project is proposed.
You will use the assessment of the organization’s culture and readiness in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Include the following:
- Describe the organization’s culture and explain to what degree the culture supports change. Consider organizational and leadership structure, mission and values, interprofessional collaboration/team engagement, communication, perception of the organization by employees, etc.
- Select an organizational readiness tool and assess the level or readiness for change within your organization. Identify the readiness tool and summarize the survey results.
- Propose strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization.
- Discuss the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change. Consider strengths and weaknesses, potential barriers, stakeholder support, timing of the proposal, and resources.
- Discuss what health care process and systems you would recommend for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization.
- Identify the stakeholders and team members for the project. Include what their duties will be in the evidence-based practice project proposal.
- Explain what information and communication technologies are needed for the implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders.
- Explain how these will help improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations for your intervention.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document, located in Class Resources, for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the “APA Writing Checklist,” located in Class Resources, to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MBA-MSN; MSN
3.1: Assess health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization.
3.3: Integrate appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations.
Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness – Rubric
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total100 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organizational Culture and Degree to Which Culture Supports Change
Organizational Culture and Degree to Which Culture Supports Change |
0 points
The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change are not discussed. |
8 points
The discussion of organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change are incomplete. |
8.8 points
The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change are summarized. Some key aspects of the culture are outlined but lack?explanation and supporting research. |
9.2 points
The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change are discussed. Key aspects of the culture are included. In general, explanations and support are provided. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
10 points
The organizational culture and the degree to which it supports change are thoroughly discussed. The various aspects of the culture are included. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. |
Organizational Readiness Tool and Readiness Assessment
Organizational Readiness Tool and Readiness Assessment |
0 points
An organizational readiness tool is not selected; the level or readiness is not assessed. |
8 points
The organizational readiness tool is identified. The survey results and interpretation are incomplete. |
8.8 points
The organizational readiness tool is identified, and the survey results are summarized. The degree to which the culture will support and sustain evidence-based practice changes is generally discussed. The narrative lacks explanation and supporting research. |
9.2 points
The organizational readiness tool is identified, and the survey results are presented. The degree to which the culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice changes is discussed. Strengths and weaknesses, potential barriers, stakeholder support, timing of the proposal, and resources are generally considered. Some minor rationale is needed. |
10 points
The organizational readiness tool is identified, and the survey results are presented. The degree to which the culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice changes is thoroughly discussed. Strengths and weaknesses, potential barriers, stakeholder support, timing of the proposal, and resources are clearly considered. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. |
Health Care Process and Systems Recommended for Improving Quality, Safety, Cost-Effectiveness (B)
Health Care Process and Systems Recommended for Improving Quality, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness (C3.1) |
0 points
A discussion on what health care process and systems are recommended for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization is omitted. |
16 points
A discussion on what health care process and systems are recommended for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization is incomplete. |
17.6 points
A summary on what health care process and systems are recommended for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization is presented. The narrative lacks explanation and supporting research. |
18.4 points
The health care process and systems recommended for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization is discussed. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
20 points
The health care process and systems recommended for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization is thoroughly discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. |
Strategies to Facilitate Organizational Readiness
Strategies to Facilitate Organizational Readiness |
0 points
Strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization are not proposed. |
8 points
Strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization are incomplete. |
8.8 points
General strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization are proposed. The strategies lack explanation and supporting research. |
9.2 points
Strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization are proposed. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
10 points
Clear strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization are proposed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. |
Organizational Culture in Evidence-Based Practice Change
|
0 points
The description of the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change is not discussed. |
8 points
The description of the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change is incomplete. |
8.8 points
The description of the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change is discussed. The strategies lack explanation and supporting research. |
9.2 points
The description of the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change is discussed. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
10 points
The description of the degree to which the organizational culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change is thoroughly discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided. |
Stakeholders and Team Members Needed
Stakeholders and Team Members Needed |
0 points
Stakeholders and team members for the project are omitted. |
4 points
Stakeholders and team members for the project are only partially identified. |
4.4 points
Some key stakeholders and team members for the project, including their respective duties, are outlined. |
4.6 points
Key stakeholders and team members for the project, including their respective duties, are identified. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
5 points
The stakeholders and team members for the project, including their respective duties, are thoroughly identified. |
Information and Communication Technologies Needed for Implementation (B)
Information and Communication Technologies Needed for Implementation (C.3.3) |
0 points
The information and communication technologies needed for implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders are omitted. |
8 points
The information and communication technologies needed for implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders are only partially explained. |
8.8 points
The information and communication technologies needed for implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders are summarized. More explanation is need for how these will help improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations for the intervention. |
9.2 points
The information and communication technologies needed for implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders are discussed. How they will help improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations for the intervention is explained. Minor detail is needed for clarity or support. |
10 points
The information and communication technologies needed for implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders are clearly discussed. How they will help improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations for the intervention is thoroughly explained. Clear support is provided. |
Required Sources
Required Sources |
0 points
Sources are not included. |
4 points
Number of required sources is only partially met. |
4.4 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. |
4.6 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
5 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
Thesis Development and Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience. |
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident. |
1.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience. |
1.76 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated. |
1.84 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience. |
2 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience. |
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development. |
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered. |
4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose. |
4.4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
4.6 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose. |
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives. |
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer. |
4 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present. |
4.4 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used. |
4.6 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated. |
5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc. |
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. |
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. |
4.4 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. |
4.6 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. |
5 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline. |
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided. |
2.4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident. |
2.64 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors. |
2.76 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors. |
3 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated. |
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.