NUR 674 Graphic Project Timeline

NUR 674 Graphic Project Timeline

NUR 674 Graphic Project Timeline

A project timeline is essential to understand the stages of implementing a suggested evidence-based project in clinical settings. Graphic project timelines give a visual representation of a proposed project or intervention in a practicum site and show the roles and responsibilities of various stakeholders, activities, and expected implementation deadline or timeframe (Yoder-Wise et al., 2023). The proposed project is to enhance communication among providers like nurses aimed at reducing medication administration errors, particularly during shift handover. Based on my discussion with the preceptor, we agreed to develop and implement communication interventions leveraging health technologies like barcode scanning of medications to reduce medication errors. As such, the following is a proposed project timeline using a graphic organizer on the implementation of the intervention.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NUR 674 Graphic Project Timeline
Just from $7/Page
Order Essay

Project Timeline Graphic Organizer

 

i). Project Approval

Based on evidence on the effects of medication errors and upon a needs assessment conducted in the organization, the evidence-based team in collaboration with the preceptor realized the importance of implementing an effective communication protocol, including integration of technologies like bar code medication administration (BCMA) tool, to reduce and prevent medication errors (Boehme et al., 2022). Effective communication at the shift handover and integrating tools like BCMA are critical in lowering miscommunication and misunderstanding that can occur among nurses and physicians and reduce the possibility of medication errors. Given that this is the first stage of the project, organizing thoughts and ideas based on the facility’s goals and the stakeholders involved would require an estimated two-week time frame. The two weeks will be from September 16th to 30th 20224. The core stakeholders at this stage will include the project team comprising the manager, my preceptor, the nurse manager and leader, the information and technology (IT) manager, and the quality assurance manager. The manager will be in charge of the project and provider deliverables while the preceptor will guide the process. The nurse manager and leader will collect project requirements and have input on the proposed communication model based on the unit’s and nurses’ needs to meet patients’ concerns, needs, and preferences. The IT manager and the quality assurance manager will seek ways to align the proposed project with the organization’s health systems and compliance with regulatory and best practices in the industry.

ii). Education Development

The education development stage will focus on materials and content that the project team will create and prepare to disseminate to the different stakeholders based on their roles and responsibilities during and after the implementation. Consequently, the development phase will fall immediately after the approval and occur in the first two weeks of October, from 1st to 15th, 2024. The core content of the education development will be on areas of change management, the importance of the proposed interventions, understanding of the organizational culture, and all aspects of change implementation, especially encouraging and motivating nurses and all internal stakeholders. The development will also focus on developing strategies aimed at attaining the set project goals (Vitello-Cicciu et al., 2020). Stakeholders at this stage will include nurses who will have input on education areas, nurse managers who will collect the content and suggest learning areas during the implementation

iii). Stakeholder Education

Stakeholder education will be the third phase of the implementation and will entail having sessions with all stakeholders. The training sessions will be conducted within a week during the third week of October 2024 to ensure that all stakeholders understand the importance of the proposed project. The stakeholder education sessions will offer an opportunity to actively engage and enhance the participation of all people in the facility (Owens et al., 2020). The training sessions will also entail educating the stakeholders on their various roles and responsibilities in implementing the proposed project. All stakeholders will understand their roles, led by the nurse manager and nurse leader as well as the project manager.

iv). Implementation Date

The implementation of the communication changes will span four weeks, from October 14th to November 15th, 2024. The implementation will entail rolling out new communication procedures, policies, and technological interventions, including bar code medication administration (BCMA) in nursing units (Kennedy et al., 2023). All stakeholders will take charge of their responsibilities based on their areas as outlined during the planning or initial phase and approval stage. The project manager in collaboration with the nurse manager and nurse leaders will coordinate the activities, make changes where necessary, and report on a daily, and weekly basis on the attainment of each task and goal. The IT and quality assurance managers will compile all achievements, record feedback from nurses and patients, and determine gaps for changes to improve implementation.

v). Assessment of Initial Outcomes/Implementation

The assessment of initial outcomes will be during the first two weeks of the implementation, the first and second weeks. The project manager will compile a comprehensive report for presentation to the team and stakeholders based on daily and weekly feedback and observations from the implementation team, especially nurses (Smith et al., 2020). The assessment will also integrate patient satisfaction surveys in all areas, and ease of using the system by providers to determine areas for improvement and goals achieved by this period. The assessment will happen at the start of the first week of November 2024. The assessment will evaluate nurses’ engagement with the system. Preceptor engagement and program satisfaction will occur through surveys by nurse managers.

vi). Reassessment of Outcomes

The reassessment of the outcomes will be after the final week of the implementation in the third week of November 2024. The reassessment will take a week and determine if the project attained its goals, the challenges, and recommend if the facility makes it part of its culture to improve communication and reduce errors. The project manager will provide a report and make recommendations based on objective evaluation by an external evaluator who will be invited at the tail-end of the project.

References

Boehme, S., Wohlt, P., Valentine, J., & Ensign, R. (2022). Sustained barcode medication

administration rates less than 2 percent in a large healthcare system. Journal of Patient

Safety and Risk Management, 27(6): 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435221137145

Kennedy, G. A., Pedram, S., & Sanzone, S. (2023). Improving safety outcomes through medical

error reduction via virtual reality-based clinical skills training. Safety Science, 165, 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106200

Owens, K., Palmore, M., Penoyer, D., & Viers, P. (2020). The effect of implementing bar-code

medication administration in an emergency department on medication administration errors and nursing satisfaction. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 46(6): 884-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2020.07.004

Smith, C. M., & Johnson, C. S. (2020). Preparing nurse leaders in nursing professional

development: Theories applied to leadership in nursing professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 34(1), 38-40.

DOI: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000404

Vitello-Cicciu, J. M. (2020). Am I an authentic nursing leader for healthy workplace

environments? Nurse Leader, 17(3): 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2019.03.011

Yoder-Wise, P. S., & Sportsman, S. (2022). Leading and Managing in Nursing E-Book: Leading

and Managing in Nursing E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a graphic timeline for the development of your project. Your timeline must include the deadline or timeframe for your:

  • Project approval
  • Education development
  • Stakeholder education
  • Implementation date
  • Assessment of initial outcomes/implementation
  • Reassessment of outcomes

You may include other important touchpoints for your specific project.

Include the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in each implementation step. Be sure to provide sufficient detail. Please keep in mind some of the dates may be after your practicum has ended.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing?is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

 

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for low visionOpen the accessibility menu

Graphic Project Timeline – Rubric

 

ListGrid

Print To PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total55 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Deadline or Timeframe for Project Approval

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval or the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for the project approval is included. The roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are explained thoroughly.

Deadline or Timeframe for Education Development

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for the education development or the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders is incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for the education development is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for education development is included. The roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved are explained thoroughly.

Deadline or Timeframe for Stakeholder Education

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education or the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders is incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for stakeholder education is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are explained thoroughly.

Deadline or Timeframe for Implementation Date

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for the implementation date is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are explained thoroughly.

Deadline or Timeframe for Assessment of Initial Outcomes/Implementation

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for assessment of initial outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are explained thoroughly.

Deadline or Timeframe for Reassessment of Outcomes

 

0 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes outcomes/implementation and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are not included.

6.6 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes outcomes/implementation and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are incomplete or incorrect.

7.26 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are included but lacking relevant detail.

7.59 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are clear.

8.25 points

The deadline or timeframe for reassessment of outcomes outcomes/implementation is included. The roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders are explained thoroughly.

Layout of Graphic Organizer

 

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

2.2 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

2.42 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2.53 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text

2.75 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

2.2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

2.42 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

2.53 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2.75 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 


Good News ! We now help with PROCTORED EXAMS. Chat with a support agent for more information

X
Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?