NURS 6003 Foundational Neuroscience

NURS 6003 Foundational Neuroscience

NURS 6003 Foundational Neuroscience

Agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6003 Foundational Neuroscience
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The four ligands that bind to a cell surface receptor are agonists, antagonists, partial agonists, and inverse agonists. An agonist is a drug that binds to the receptor to produce a similar response to the anticipated chemical and receptor. An antagonist binds to the receptor on the primary or another site, blocking the receptor from eliciting a response (Weir, 2020). Partial agonists affect the efficacy of psychopharmacologic treatments since they do not elicit the maximal response that the tissue can. Inverse agonists also affect the efficacy of treatments since they bind to a receptor and elicit a pharmacological response that conflicts with the corresponding agonist.

Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion-gated channels.

G- couple proteins and Ion-gated channels are transmembrane proteins that take part in the exchange of ions and molecules via the plasma membrane of the postsynaptic neuron. They bind to neurotransmitters at the synaptic cleft (David et al., 2022). Ion-gated channels play a role in the direct opening of ion channels after binding of a neurotransmitter. G-couple proteins play a role in the indirect binding of ion channels through metabolic activation of G-protein.

Explain how the role of epigenetics may contribute to pharmacologic action.

Epigenetics are increasingly being studied in healthcare due to their relationship with protein production, gene function, and human health and disease. Epigenetics contributes to pharmacologic action as it helps discover drugs, especially for cancer (Marinova, 2020).

 

Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to patients.

The information on the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum will influence how I prescribe medications since I must be well-versed with drugs that produce a full response, partial response, no action, or the opposite of the desired action. For example, when prescribing benzodiazepines to patients with anxiety disorders, I will need to know that medications acting at benzodiazepine receptors have two types of pharmacological profiles (McDonald & Lambert, 2022). Benzodiazepine agonists are anxiolytic, sedative, and anticonvulsant, while benzodiazepine inverse agonists result in anxiety and convulsions.

References

David, D., Bentulila, Z., Tauber, M., & Ben-Chaim, Y. (2022). G protein-coupled receptors regulated by membrane potential. International Journal of Molecular Sciences23(22), 13988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213988

Marinova, Z. (2020). Why ‘epidrugs’ will be the next major focus for precision medicine. Pharm J.

McDonald, J., & Lambert, D. G. (2022). Drug-receptor interactions in anesthesia. BJA Education22(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.07.009

Weir, C. J. (2020). Ion channels, receptors, agonists, and antagonists. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine21(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2019.10.022

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Foundational Neuroscience

As a psychiatric and mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat patients, you must not only understand the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders but also how medications for these disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your colleagues.

For this Discussion, review the Learning Resources and reflect on the concepts of foundational neuroscience as they might apply to your role as the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner in prescribing medications for patients.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th Ed.) Cambridge University Press.
    • Chapter 2, “Transporters, Receptors, and Enzymes as Targets of Psychopharmacological Drug Action” (pp. 29-50)
    • Chapter 3, “Ion Channels as Targets of Psychopharmacological Drug Action) (pp. 51-76)

Required Media

  • Links to an external site.. http://neuroanatomy.ca/videos.html

    Note: Please review all of the media under the neuroanatomy series.

Optional Resources

  • Pathopharmacology: Disorders of the Nervous System: Exploring the Human Brain

    Dr. Norbert Myslinski reviews the structure and function of the human brain. Using human brains, he examines and illustrates the development of the brain and areas impacted by disorders associated with the brain. (15m)

  • Introduction to Advanced Pharmacology

    In this media presentation, Dr. Terry Buttaro, associate professor of practice at Simmons School of Nursing and Health Sciences, discusses the importance of pharmacology for the advanced practice nurse. (6m)

 

By Day 3 of Week 2

Post a response to each of the following:

  1. Explain the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents, including how partial and inverse agonist functionality may impact the efficacy of psychopharmacologic treatments.
  2. Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion gated channels.
  3. Explain how the role of epigenetics may contribute to pharmacologic action.
  4. Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to patients. Include a specific example of a situation or case with a patient in which the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner must be aware of the medication’s action.

Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 2

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one of the following ways:

  • If your colleagues’ posts influenced your understanding of these concepts, be sure to share how and why. Include additional insights you gained.
  • If you think your colleagues might have misunderstood these concepts, offer your alternative perspective and be sure to provide an explanation for them. Include resources to support your perspective.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

NURS_6630_Week2_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week2_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 to >39.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)…. Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources…. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least three current credible sources.

39 to >34.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)…. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least three credible references.

34 to >30.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)…. One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed…. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Post is cited with fewer than two credible references.

30 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)…. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria…. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Contains only one or no credible references.

44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Written clearly and concisely…. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Written concisely…. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Written somewhat concisely…. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Contains some APA formatting errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Not written clearly or concisely…. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Timely and full participation
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Posts main Discussion by due date…. Meets requirements for full participation.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts main Discussion by due date.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post main Discussion by due date.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 


Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?