NURS 6052 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?

NURS 6052 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?

NURS 6052: World Is Evidence-Based Practice

Healthcare organizations use evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to enhance the quality of care and generate better outcomes for patients. EBP is a core concept in healthcare as it integrates different aspects that include the best research evidence, experience and expertise of healthcare providers, and patient preferences (Melnyk et al., 2023). Many healthcare entities have incorporated EBP as a core part of their quality care delivery, reducing cost burden, and enhancing patient outcomes.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6052 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

The selected organization in this case is the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHQR) is one of the agencies within the Health and Human Services (HHS) headquarters in Maryland. The agency was established as the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research in 1989 as a part of the Public Health Service (PHS) to improve the quality, appropriateness, and effectiveness of health care service as well as accessibility to care through different activities that include carrying out and supporting research, demonstration initiatives, and evaluations as well as development of guidelines and disseminating health care services information.

The AHRQ supports research aimed at improving the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans as captured in its mission (AHRQ, 2022). The organization’s EBP efforts are well-captured through its mission which states that it produces evidence to ensure a safer, high quality, accessible and equitable as well as affordable healthcare for all Americans through the Health and Human Services (HHS) department. The organization is categorical that through working with other partners and within the department, more stakeholders will understand, appreciate and use evidence in delivery of better care.

Again, the agency has established an Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) that allows it to sponsor and support the development of different reports to help public and private-sector organizations in their efforts to enhance the quality of healthcare in the country. The website asserts that EPCs exist in universities, medical centers, and research establishments in the country (AHRQ) (2023). Established over 25 years ago, these centers demonstrate the critical role of the agency in developing evidence-based interventions to improve care delivery and reduce overall costs.

AHRQ’s work is grounded in EBP as it focuses on improving patient outcomes through research evidence and best practices. Through its EPCs, the agency ensures that healthcare organizations use current interventions to deliver care that meets patient and health population needs (AHRQ, 2023b). The organization’s EPC initiative which is over 25 years old demonstrates its focus on EBP to improve the delivery of quality patient care.

The information about AHRQ has changed my perception about it in relation to EBP. At the core of EBP is the cultivation of a spirit of inquiry and search for the best evidence as well as appraising the evidence and implementing it while also assessing the outcomes and sharing results. Therefore, I believe that research and implementation are core aspects of effective EBP practice in healthcare organizations.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2022). About AHRQ.

https://www.ahrq.gov/cpi/about/index.html

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2023). Celebrating 25 Years of AHRQ’s

Evidence-based Practice Center Program. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/about/epc-25-years

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2023b). Evidence-based Practice

            Centers. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/about/epc

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing &

            healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?

March 21, 2010, was not EBP’s date of birth, but it may be the date the approach “grew up” and left home to take on the world.

When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it came with a requirement of empirical evidence. Research on EBP increased significantly. Application of EBP spread to allied health professions, education, healthcare technology, and more. Health organizations began to adopt and promote EBP.

In this Discussion, you will consider this adoption. You will examine healthcare organization websites and analyze to what extent these organizations use EBP.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
    • Chapter 1, “Making the Case for Evidence-Based Practice and Cultivating a Spirit of Inquiry” (pp. 7–36

Required Media

Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Evidence-Based Practice and Research [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

 

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP.
  • Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited body, or a national initiative).
  • Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by visiting the websites they shared and offering additional examples of EBP or alternative views/interpretations to those shared in your colleagues’ posts.

Search entries or author Filter replies by unread

 

NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 ptsGood

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). …One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Posts main post by day 3.

0 ptsPoor

Does not post by day 3.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response
18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. …Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. …Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. …Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. …No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response
17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. …Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation
5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 


Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?