NURS 6053 WEEK 1 Review of Current Healthcare Issues

NURS 6053 WEEK 1 Review of Current Healthcare Issues

Review of Current Healthcare Issues

Patients should receive high-quality care in safe environments. However, multiple healthcare issues impede healthcare organizations’ ability to achieve this goal while increasing management costs, among other adverse outcomes. A national healthcare issue significantly affecting the work setting is a nursing shortage. In the United States, the nursing shortage is a multifaceted problem caused by the influx of patients in healthcare facilities, high nurse turnover, an aging population, and poor working conditions (Hamlin, 2023; Tamata et al., 2023). Potential impacts of the nursing shortage on the work setting include increased nurse burnout, patient dissatisfaction with care, overcrowding, and extended hospital stays. Understanding the complexity and multidimensional nature of the issue can help healthcare leaders implement sustainable solutions to mitigate its effects on patients, the nursing workforce, and healthcare organizations.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6053 WEEK 1 Review of Current Healthcare Issues
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect the nursing shortage in various dimensions. For instance, problems increasing vulnerability to chronic diseases lead to a proportional increase in the number of patients seeking care in healthcare settings (Barrio-Cortes et al., 2021). Environments characterized by poor access to healthy foods and facilities that promote physical activities increase the risk of lifestyle diseases. Inadequate access to care increases the risk of hospitalization for preventable diseases. Education also influences health choices, including practices, behaviors, and decisions regarding when and where to seek healthcare support.

Healthcare settings respond differently to the nursing shortage. Broome and Marshall (2021) mentioned the practicality of telemedicine, collaborative care, and new models in response to the shortage of primary care providers. In the current workplace, nurse empowerment programs to prevent nurse turnover play a significant role in addressing the nursing shortage problem. Besides, there is an intensified effort to provide tech-based care to improve access to care and reduce physical patient visits in the facility. Supportive leadership also helps healthcare workers to understand and respond to work-related stress (Greco et al., 2022). More leadership support is among the changes needed to enable the current workforce to respond to stressors related to the nursing shortage and work optimally.

References

Barrio-Cortes, J., Soria-Ruiz-Ogarrio, M., Martínez-Cuevas, M., Castaño-Reguillo, A., Bandeira-de Oliveira, M., Beca-Martínez, M. T., … & Jaime-Sisó, M. Á. (2021). Use of primary and hospital care health services by chronic patients according to risk level by adjusted morbidity groups. BMC health services research21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07020-z

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Greco, E., Graziano, E. A., Stella, G. P., Mastrodascio, M., & Cedrone, F. (2022). The impact of leadership on perceived work-related stress in healthcare facilities organizations. Journal of organizational change management35(4/5), 734-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-07-2021-0201

Hamlin, K. (2023). Why is there a nursing shortage? Nurse Journal. https://nursejournal.org/articles/why-is-there-a-nursing-shortage/

Tamata, A. T., & Mohammadnezhad, M. (2023). A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals. Nursing open10(3), 1247-1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1434

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Review of Current Healthcare Issues

If you were to ask 10 people what they believe to be the most significant issue facing healthcare today, you might get 10 different answers. Escalating costs? Regulation? Technology disruption? Social Determinant such as environment/community, education, access/quality to healthcare?

These and many other topics are worthy of discussion. Not surprisingly, much has been said in the research, within the profession, and in the news about these topics. Whether they are issues of finance, quality, workload, or outcomes, there is no shortage of changes to be addressed.

In this Discussion, you examine a national healthcare issue and consider how that issue may impact your work setting. You also analyze how your organization has responded to this issue.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and select one current national healthcare issue/stressor to focus on.
  • Reflect on the current national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and think about how this issue/stressor may be addressed in your work setting.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a description of the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for analysis, and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor may impact your work setting. Which social determinant(s) most affects this health issue? Then, describe how your health system work setting has responded to the healthcare issue/stressor, including a description of what changes may have been implemented. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national healthcare issue/stressor than you selected. Explain how their chosen national healthcare issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address the national healthcare issue/stressor.

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
    • Chapter 2, “Transformational Leadership: Complexity, Change, and Strategic Planning” (pp. 34–62)
    • Chapter 3, “Current Challenges in Complex Health Care Organizations and the Quadruple Aim” (pp. 66–97)

Read any TWO of the following (plus TWO additional readings on your selected issue):

Academic Support Resources

Required Media

  • Walden University, LLC. (Producer). (2015). Leading in Healthcare Organizations of the Future [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 ptsGood

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. …Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. …Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Posts main post by day 3.

0 ptsPoor

Does not post by day 3.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response
18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. …Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response
17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation
5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 

 


Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?