NURS 6501 Alterations in Cellular Processes

NURS 6501 Alterations in Cellular Processes

Alterations in Cellular Processes

This paper is a case study involving a 27-year-old patient with a history of substance abuse who is found unresponsive by emergency medical services. The patient becomes responsive after being administered naloxone. The essay examines the role of genetics, reasons for patient’s symptoms, physiological response, cells involved, and influence of other characteristics.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6501 Alterations in Cellular Processes
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Genetics play a role in substance use disorders. For example, opioid use disorder has large risk of being inherited in families. Genes such as OPRM1 variates and A118G also predispose individuals to substance abuse disorder. Individuals of European descent with OPRD1 genes also have high predisposition to opioid use disorder. Additional genes include KCNG2, CNHIH3, KCNC1, RGMA, and APBB2 genes (Crist et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2019).

The patient presented with symptoms such as unresponsiveness due to central nervous system depression by the opiate overdose. The patient became response following the administration of naloxone since its an opiate antagonist that reverses the depressing effects of opiates. The patient reported pain in left hip and forearm because the effects of the opiates had ben reversed, hence, perception of pain. There is also tissue necrosis that may have developed due to poor tissue perfusion from depressed central nervous system, which affected circulation and respiratory system (Parthvi et al., 2019). The patient also developed respiratory acidosis, which increased serum potassium, hence, hyperkalemia and ECG changes.

The cells involved in the patient’s symptoms include mast cells, neutrophils, and macrophages. These cells induce the induction and transition of the pain the patient experience. Adaptive immune cells such as B and T cells also initiate and resolve pain. Characteristics such as age would change my response in this case study (Machelska & Celik, 2020). For example, the elderly patients have low sensitivity to pain stimuli and potentially worse outcomes due to opiate overdose. These changes will affect the treatment interventions.

In summary, substance abuse has genetic predisposition. The patient developed the given symptoms because of the effects of opioid overdose and naloxone. Age would affect the clinical symptoms and management of opiate overdose.

References

Crist, R. C., Reiner, B. C., & Berrettini, W. H. (2019). A review of opioid addiction genetics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 27, 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.07.014

Liu, M., Jiang, Y., Wedow, R., Li, Y., Brazel, D. M., Chen, F., Datta, G., Davila-Velderrain, J., McGuire, D., Tian, C., Zhan, X., Choquet, H., Docherty, A. R., Faul, J. D., Foerster, J. R., Fritsche, L. G., Gabrielsen, M. E., Gordon, S. D., Haessler, J., … Vrieze, S. (2019). Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nature Genetics, 51(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0307-5

Machelska, H., & Celik, M. Ö. (2020). Opioid Receptors in Immune and Glial Cells—Implications for Pain Control. Frontiers in Immunology, 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00300

Parthvi, R., Agrawal, A., Khanijo, S., Tsegaye, A., & Talwar, A. (2019). Acute Opiate Overdose: An Update on Management Strategies in Emergency Department and Critical Care Unit. American Journal of Therapeutics, 26(3), e380. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000681

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Alterations in Cellular Processes

At its core, pathology is the study of disease. Diseases occur for many reasons. But some, such as cystic fibrosis and Parkinson’s Disease, occur because of alterations that prevent cells from functioning normally.

Understanding of signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

For this Discussion, you examine a case study and explain the disease that is suggested. You examine the symptoms reported and explain the cells that are involved and potential alterations and impacts.

resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific scenario for this Discussion. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

by day 3 of Week 1

Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:

  • The role genetics plays in the disease.
  • Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.
  • The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.
  • The cells that are involved in this process.
  • How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

by day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days and respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. In your explanation, include why their explanations make physiological sense or why they do not.

 

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your peers’ posting. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

NURS_6501_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6501_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 ptsGood

Responds to the Discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 ptsFair

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Post: Timeliness
10 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Posts main post by Day 3.

0 ptsFair

N/A

0 ptsGood

N/A

0 ptsPoor

Does not post main post by Day 3.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response
18 to >16.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response
17 to >15.0 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of Learning Objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation
5 to >0.0 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

0 ptsFair

N/A

0 ptsGood

N/A

0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?