NURS 6512 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns

NURS 6512 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns

BC is a 49-year-old woman who has been admitted to the emergency room with cardiac arrest. BC has advanced-stage cancer. She is with her husband and one of her children. Adequate health assessment data should be obtained from BC and her family members to develop an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. The nurse should obtain subjective data. This includes information about her symptoms, onset, severity, and alleviating, exacerbating, and relieving factors. The nurse should also obtain information about BC’s medical and surgical history. This includes information about any other chronic conditions apart from advanced cancer, hospitalizations, and surgeries (Giger & Haddad, 2020; Greer et al., 2020). Information about her current use of medications, allergies, and reproductive history should be obtained.

Objective data should also be obtained from BC. This includes vital signs and a comprehensive review of all the body systems to rule out any abnormalities. The nurse will use the objective data to validate BC’s complaints. laboratory and diagnostic investigations should also be ordered. They include a complete blood count, renal and liver function tests, electrolyte levels test, a chest x-ray, and an electrocardiogram (Giger & Haddad, 2020). The diagnostic and laboratory investigations will help confirm the diagnosis and rule out differential diagnoses.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6512 Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

I will respond to the case scenario by focusing on the provision of patient-centered care to BC. I will demonstrate professional behaviors such as active listening, empathy, and respecting BC’s values and preferences. I will seek her and her family’s input in the treatment decisions. I will also provide her with accurate and adequate information to aid informed decision-making. I will also ensure data privacy and confidentiality. BC’s information will only be shared after informed consent has been obtained from her (Chua et al., 2020; Gennari et al., 2021; Molina-Mula & Gallo-Estrada, 2020). I will also be a proactive member of the interprofessional teams involved in her care to ensure the delivery of high-quality, safe, and efficient care.

References

Chua, G. P., Pang, G. S. Y., Yee, A. C. P., Neo, P. S. H., Zhou, S., Lim, C., Wong, Y. Y., Qu, D. L., Pan, F. T., & Yang, G. M. (2020). Supporting the patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: What are their palliative care needs? BMC Cancer, 20(1), 768. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07239-9

Gennari, A., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Cortés, J., Azambuja, E. de, DeMichele, A., Dent, R., Fenlon, D., Gligorov, J., Hurvitz, S. A., Im, S.-A., Krug, D., Kunz, W. G., Loi, S., Penault-Llorca, F., Ricke, J., Robson, M., Rugo, H. S., Saura, C., … Harbeck, N. (2021). ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer☆. Annals of Oncology, 32(12), 1475–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019

Giger, J. N., & Haddad, L. (2020). Transcultural Nursing – E-Book: Assessment and Intervention. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Greer, J. A., Applebaum, A. J., Jacobsen, J. C., Temel, J. S., & Jackson, V. A. (2020). Understanding and Addressing the Role of Coping in Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(9), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00013

Molina-Mula, J., & Gallo-Estrada, J. (2020). Impact of Nurse-Patient Relationship on Quality of Care and Patient Autonomy in Decision-Making. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030835

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns

 

As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?

In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare

Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.

  • Based on the scenarios provided:
    • Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
    • What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
    • Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.

The Lab Assignment

Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

By Day 6 of Week 11

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Write a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:·  Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number).
35 to >29.0 ptsExcellent

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.

29 to >23.0 ptsGood

The response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.

23 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response lacks and/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing.

35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome ·   Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.

44 to >38.0 ptsGood

The response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

38 to >32.0 ptsFair

The response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature.

32 to >0 ptsPoor

The response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?