NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction

NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction

NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients with Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction

Addiction is characterized by behavioral, psychological, and physical symptoms caused by a person having inadequate control over the use of a substance. One of the addiction disorders is gambling, characterized by frequent and repetitive involvement in gambling. Affected persons are unable to resist the urge to gamble, and this dominates, making them neglect their educational, occupational, and social obligations. The purpose of this assignment is to describe a patient with an addiction disorder and discuss the treatment interventions.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Introduction to the Case

The case depicts Mrs. Perez, a 53-year-old woman who reports having problems with alcohol since she was in her 20s. She states that the problems began when her father died in her late teens and has severally attended Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. According to Perez, the last two years have been challenging for her in her efforts to remain sober after a casino was opened near her place of residence. She gambles at the casino, which makes her high. She mentions that she takes some drinks to calm her when gambling, particularly in intense games. The few drinks lead to more drinking and make her gamble irresponsibly. The irresponsible gambling has left her in debt of over $50,000.

Mrs. Perez is worried about her smoking pattern, which has worsened in the past two years. She mostly smokes when gambling but rarely smokes when taking alcohol. Her presentation leads to diagnoses of Gambling disorder and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Patient factors that can influence decisions when developing a treatment plan include comorbid medical conditions, the patient’s previous response to AUD therapy, the patient’s level of motivation to achieve abstinence, and treatment adherence.

Decision #1

Vivitrol (Naltrexone) injection, 380 mg IM in the gluteal region every four weeks.

Why I Selected This Decision

Naltrexone was the drug of choice because it effectively reduces alcohol consumption by decreasing alcohol cravings. Ray et al. (2019) found that Naltrexone reduces craving, reduces stimulation, increases sedation, and increases negative mood, which results in decreased alcohol intake. Besides, a monthly injection formulation would foster treatment adherence, leading to better treatment outcomes.

Why I Did Not Select the Other Two Options

            Antabuse (Disulfiram) was not ideal because it causes disulfiram ethanol reaction (DER) when a patient takes alcohol and thus requires supervised use. DER is characterized by flushing, tachycardia, hypotension, tachypnea, palpitations, headache, sweating, nausea, vomiting, giddiness, and a sense of impending doom associated with severe anxiety (Castrén et al., 2019). Campral (acamprosate) was not the drug of choice because it is primarily indicated to attain and maintain complete abstinence instead of reducing or preventing relapse in regular alcohol use (Stokłosa et al., 2023). It also requires three times daily dosing, which may lead to challenges with compliance.

What I Was Hoping to Achieve

            The clinician hoped that Naltrexone would suppress the patient’s craving for alcohol, leading to reduced intake. Stokłosa et al. (2023) explain that Naltrexone suppresses the reward system and reduces the pleasure experienced after consuming alcohol products.

Ethical Considerations That May Impact the Treatment Plan and Communication

Ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence may impact the treatment plan since the clinician has to consider a treatment intervention linked with the best outcomes and least harm for patients with AUD. Communication may be affected by the patient’s right to autonomy, given that the clinician has to discuss the treatment plan with the patient.

Decision #2

Refer Mrs. Perez to a counselor to address gambling issues.

Why I Selected This Decision

The patient was referred to a counselor because psychological intervention is effective in treating gambling addiction, and there is no approved drug to treat the disorder. Eriksen et al. (2023) found that cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has the strongest evidence supporting its effectiveness in managing gambling addiction. Besides, Cognitive-behavioral approaches are simple and effective.

Why I Did Not Select the Other Two Options

            Adding Valium to treat the patient’s anxiety was not ideal because it is a dose-dependent side effect of Naltrexone (Ray et al., 2019). Counseling can help the client identify and manage her causes of anxiety through effective coping mechanisms (Higueruela-Ahijado et al., 2023). Moreover, Chantix (varenicline) was not ideal for the patient’s smoking habit since it is linked with gambling. Thus, it is essential to first address gambling addiction, which will lead to reduced smoking (Eriksen et al., 2023).

What I Was Hoping to Achieve

The NP hoped that counseling would help the patient identify the causes of her gambling disorder and address these issues, which would reduce his gambling and smoking and prevent alcohol relapse. In the initial stages, including during detoxification, patients are given supportive psychotherapy in counseling to encourage them and enhance their motivation (Higueruela-Ahijado et al., 2023).

Ethical Considerations That May Impact the Treatment Plan and Communication

            Beneficence may impact treatment because the NP has to identify the best measure to address the patient’s gambling disorder to avoid a relapse of alcohol use. Furthermore, the NP has to obtain the patient’s consent when initiating a treatment intervention, which may impact communication with the client.

Decision #3

Explore Mrs. Perez’s issue with her counselor and encourage her to continue attending GA meetings.

Why I Selected This Decision

It was crucial to identify the issues the patient has with her counselor to help address them and motivate the client to continue with therapy. Ruud and Friis (2022) explain that continuity of care and therapeutic relationships (TRs) are considered essential factors by clients in mental health. Addressing issues can help establish and maintain a good TR between Perez and her counselor.

Why I Did Not Select the Other Two Options

            It would be inappropriate to persuade the client to continue attending counseling without addressing the reasons why she did not like the counselor. This can affect their TR and limit the patient from getting the best from the counseling sessions (Ruud & Friis, 2022). Stopping Vivitrol was inappropriate at this point since it can lead to a relapse, especially when the client has not addressed her gambling issue (Stokłosa et al., 2023).

What I Was Hoping to Achieve

            The NP hoped that the patient would continue with therapy after exploring and addressing the issues she has with her counselor. The NP also hoped that encouraging Perez to continue attending GA meetings would help her address her addiction problem. Group therapy, such as GA sessions, provides counseling and support to deal with common issues (Eriksen et al., 2023). The groups use educational and operational principles to explain drug abuse as a disease and various methods used to avoid drug-seeking behaviors.

Ethical Considerations That May Impact the Treatment Plan and Communication

The NP had to uphold confidentiality when exploring issues with the client, which may impact treatment and communication. For instance, the NP must assure the patient that what will be discussed will be kept confidential to encourage the client to express her concerns with the counselor.

Conclusion

Mrs. Perez was diagnosed with Gambling disorder and alcohol use disorder. She started on Naltrexone monthly injection since it decreases alcohol use by reducing craving, reducing stimulation, increasing sedation, and increasing negative mood (Ray et al., 2019). Disulfiram was not prescribed because it requires supervised use due to the disulfiram ethanol reaction (DER) that occurs when a patient takes alcohol (Castrén et al., 2019). Acamprosate was also not selected because it is indicated for patients who are maintaining complete abstinence e (Stokłosa et al., 2023).

Naltrexone led to alcohol abstinence, but the patient’s gambling problem persisted. Consequently, she was referred for counseling since psychological intervention is effective in treating gambling addiction, and there is no medication for addiction (Eriksen et al., 2023). However, the patient reported disliking her counselor but enjoyed Gamblers Anonymous meetings. The NP explored the issues Perez has with her counselor to help her have a good and effective therapeutic relationship, which is fundamental to achieving the desired therapy outcomes (Ruud & Friis, 2022). She was also encouraged to continue attending GA sessions as they provide counseling and support clients with addictions to deal with common issues. Furthermore, the patient was continued on Vivitrol to avoid relapse in alcohol use until she addresses her gambling issues through counseling.

References

Castrén, S., Mäkelä, N., & Alho, H. (2019). Selecting an appropriate alcohol pharmacotherapy: Review of recent findings. Current Opinion in Psychiatry32(4), 266-274. doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000512

Eriksen, J. W., Fiskaali, A., Zachariae, R., Wellnitz, K. B., Oernboel, E., Stenbro, A. W., Marcussen, T., & Petersen, M. W. (2023). Psychological intervention for gambling disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Behavioral Addictions12(3), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00034

Higueruela-Ahijado, M., López-Espuela, F., Caro-Alonso, P. Á., Novo, A., & Rodríguez-Martín, B. (2023). Efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy in improving the quality of life of people with compulsive gambling, a systematic review. Archives Of Psychiatric Nursing43, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2022.12.014

Ray, L. A., Green, R., Roche, D. J. O., Magill, M., & Bujarski, S. (2019). Naltrexone effects on subjective responses to alcohol in the human laboratory: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction Biology24(6), 1138–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12747

Ruud, T., & Friis, S. (2022). Continuity of care and therapeutic relationships as critical elements in acute psychiatric care. World Psychiatry: Official Journal Of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA)21(2), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20966

Stokłosa, I., Więckiewicz, G., Stokłosa, M., Piegza, M., Pudlo, R., & Gorczyca, P. (2023). Medications for the treatment of alcohol dependence-current state of knowledge and future perspectives from a public health perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health20(3), 1870. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20031870

Tigh, J., Daniel, K., & Balasanova, A. A. (2022). Impact of Hospital-Administered Extended-Release Naltrexone on Readmission Rates in Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder: A Pilot Study. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders24(6), 43569. https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.21m03213

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Assessing and Treating Patients With Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction

Impulsivity, compulsivity, and addiction are challenging disorders for patients across the life span. Impulsivity is the inclination to act upon sudden urges or desires without considering potential consequences; patients often describe impulsivity as living in the present moment without regard to the future (MentalHelp.net, n.d.). Thus, these disorders often manifest as negative behaviors, resulting in adverse outcomes for patients. For example, compulsivity represents a behavior that an individual feels driven to perform to relieve anxiety (MentalHelp.net, n.d.). The presence of these behaviors often results in addiction, which represents the process of the transition from impulsive to compulsive behavior.

In your role as the psychiatric nurse practitioner (PNP), you have the opportunity to help patients address underlying causes of the disorders and overcome these behaviors. For this Assignment, as you examine the client case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with impulsivity, compulsivity, and addiction.

Reference: MentalHelp.net. (n.d.). Impaired decision-making, impulsivity, and compulsivity: Addictions’ effect on the cerebral cortex. https://www.mentalhelp.net/addiction/impulsivity-and-compulsivity-addictions-effect-on-the-cerebral-cortex/

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Stahl, S. M. (2021). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical applications (5th Ed.) Cambridge University Press.
    • Chapter 13, “Impulsivity, Compulsivity, and Addiction” (pp. 538-578)

Medication Resources

 

Note: To access the following medications, use the Drugs@FDA resource. Type the name of each medication in the keyword search bar. Select the hyperlink related to the medication name you searched. Review the supplements provided and select the package label resource file associated with the medication you searched. If a label is not available, you may need to conduct a general search outside of this resource provided. Be sure to review the label information for each medication as this information will be helpful for your review in preparation for your Assignments.

  • naltrexone (revia/vivitrol)
  • naloxone
  • acamprosate
  • disulfiram

Required Media

Optional Resources

  • Lupi, M., Martinotti, G., Acciavatti, T., Pettorruso, M., Brunetti, M., Santacroce, R., Cinose, E., Di Iorio, G., Di Nicola, M., & Di Giannantonio, M. (2014). Pharmacological treatments in gambling disorder: A qualitative review. Biomed Research International2014

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
  • Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients requiring therapy for impulsivity, compulsivity, and addiction.

The Assignment: 5 pages

Examine Case Study: A Puerto Rican Woman With Comorbid Addiction. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.

At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.

Introduction to the case (1 page)

  • Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1 page)

  • Which decision did you select?
  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #2 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Decision #3 (1 page)

  • Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
  • What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
  • Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.

Conclusion (1 page)

  • Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.

 

Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.

Reminder : The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting

Links to an external site..

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction to the case (1 page)Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in detail the case for the Assignment…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

The response accurately summarizes the case for the Assignment…. The response accurately explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the case for the Assignment, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the specific patient factors that impact decision making with prescribing medication for this patient.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Decision #1 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.

17 to >15.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

The response accurately explains the decision selected…. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected…. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.

15 to >13.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.

13 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the decision selected…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing…. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Decision #2 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.

17 to >15.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

The response accurately explains the decision selected…. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected…. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.

15 to >13.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.

13 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing…. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Decision #3 (1–2 pages)• Which decision did you select?• Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.• What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).• Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the decision selected…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the response…. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided fully support the decisions and responses provided.

17 to >15.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

The response accurately explains the decision selected…. The response explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the decision selected…. The response accurately explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that support the response…. The response accurately explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided support the decisions and responses provided.

15 to >13.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the decision selected…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the response…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients…. Examples provided may support the decisions and responses provided.

13 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains in detail the decision selected…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the decision selected, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that do not support the response, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication with patients, or is missing…. Examples provided do not support the decisions and responses provided, or is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion (1 page)• Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient…. The response accurately and clearly explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that fully support the recommendations provided.

13 to >11.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

The response accurately summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient…. The response accurately explains a justification for the recommendation provided, including clinically relevant resources that support the recommendations provided.

11 to >10.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that inaccurately or vaguely support the recommendations provided.

10 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient, or is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains a justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant resources that do not support the recommendations provided, or is missing.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time….Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 


Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?