NURS 6630 Comparing and Contrasting Pharmacologic Options for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

NURS 6630 Comparing and Contrasting Pharmacologic Options for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Comparing and Contrasting Pharmacologic Options for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

            The occurrence of spontaneous remission in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is less than 33% (Slee et al., 2019). Furthermore, the symptoms of GAD exhibit fluctuations over the course of an individual’s lifetime. Psychopharmacologic therapy has the potential to alleviate the burden associated with GAD. The benzodiazepine class of medications, including a recently developed extended-release version of alprazolam, has been extensively studied and demonstrated to be effective in treating GAD (Sartori & Singewald, 2019). The drug exhibits a relatively low frequency of adverse reactions; however, they possess the potential to induce physical reliance, withdrawal symptoms, and sedative effects.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 6630 Comparing and Contrasting Pharmacologic Options for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Antidepressants have also demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of GAD, although with a slower onset of action compared to benzodiazepines. Tricyclic antidepressants, like imipramine, have been found to significantly alleviate symptoms of anxiety (Slee et al., 2019). However, due to the range of side effects associated with these medications, they are not typically recommended as an initial treatment option. The efficacy of extended-release venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as paroxetine and sertraline, has also been observed in the treatment of GAD (Carl et al., 2019). Although the potential link between these medications and sexual dysfunction may be deemed unacceptable by certain individuals, it is worth noting that they may be a more suitable option compared to benzodiazepines due to their lack of propensity for inducing dependence with long-term usage.

Additionally, it has been observed that buspirone exhibits a substantial decrease in symptoms associated with GAD. There is a lower incidence of sexual dysfunction associated with this medication compared to SSRIs, as well as a lower level of sedation compared to benzodiazepines (DeMartini et al., 2019). The concurrent administration of antidepressant and benzodiazepine therapy, as well as the combination of medication treatment and psychotherapy, has been found to potentially enhance the therapeutic outcomes in patients who do not exhibit a favorable response to a single treatment modality. The optimal approach for addressing the recurring symptoms of this enduring condition will remain uncertain until further extensive investigations are undertaken, encompassing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions.

References

Carl, E., Witcraft, S. M., Kauffman, B. Y., Gillespie, E. M., Becker, E. S., Cuijpers, P., Van Ameringen, M., Smits, J. A. J., & Powers, M. B. (2019). Psychological and pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy49(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2018.1560358‌

DeMartini, J., Patel, G., & Fancher, T. L. (2019). Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Annals of Internal Medicine170(7), ITC49. https://doi.org/10.7326/aitc201904020

Sartori, S. B., & Singewald, N. (2019). Novel pharmacological targets in drug development for the treatment of anxiety and anxiety-related disorders. Pharmacology & Therapeutics204, 107402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.107402

Slee, A., Nazareth, I., Bondaronek, P., Liu, Y., Cheng, Z., & Freemantle, N. (2019). Pharmacological treatments for a generalized anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet393(10173), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31793-8

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Comparing and Contrasting Pharmacologic Options for the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

 

Psychological disorders, such as depression, bipolar, and anxiety disorders can present several complications for patients of all ages. These disorders affect patients physically and emotionally, potentially impacting judgment, school and/or job performance, and relationships with family and friends. Since these disorders have many drastic effects on patients’ lives, it is important for advanced practice nurses to effectively manage patient care. With patient factors and medical history in mind, it is the advanced practice nurse’s responsibility to ensure the safe and effective diagnosis, treatment, and education of patients with psychological disorders.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder is a psychological condition that affects 6.1 million Americans, or 3.1% of the US Population. Despite several treatment options, only 43.2% of those suffering from GAD receive treatment. This week you will review several different classes of medication used in the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. You will examine potential impacts of pharmacotherapeutics used in the treatment of GAD. Please focus your assignment on FDA approved indications when referring to different medication classes used in the treatment of GAD.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
    • Chapter 26, “Antipsychotic Agents and Their Use in Schizophrenia” (pp. 203–213)
    • Chapter 27, “Antidepressants” (pp. 214–226)
    • Chapter 28, “Drugs for Bipolar Disorder” (pp. 228–233)
    • Chapter 29, “Sedative-Hypnotic Drugs” (pp. 234–242)
    • Chapter 30, “Management of Anxiety Disorders” (pp. 243–247)
    • Chapter 31, “Central Nervous System Stimulants and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder” (pp. 248–254)

Required Media

  • Links to an external site. [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZHudeMho8g&t=24s

    Note: This media program is approximately 8 minutes

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources for this module and consider the principles of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
  • Reflect on your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practices from the last 5 years and think about how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors altered his or her anticipated response to a drug.
  • Consider factors that might have influenced the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes, such as genetics (including pharmacogenetics), gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease.
  • Think about a personalized plan of care based on these influencing factors and patient history with GAD.

By Day 3 of Week 8

Post a discussion of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics related to anxiolytic medications used to treat GAD. In your discussion, utilizing the discussion highlights, compare and contrast different treatment options that can be used.

By Day 6 of Week 8

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by suggesting additional factors that might have interfered with the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patients diagnosed with GAD. In addition, suggest different treatment options you would suggest to treat a patient with the topic of discussion.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

NURS_6521_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

NURS_6521_Week8_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting
50 to >44.5 ptsExcellent

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. …Supported by at least three current, credible sources….Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44.5 to >39.5 ptsGood

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. …At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. …Supported by at least three credible sources….Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39.5 to >34.5 ptsFair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). …One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. …Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. …Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. …Post is cited with two credible sources….Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. …Contains some APA formatting errors.

34.5 to >0 ptsPoor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately….Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. …Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. …Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. …Contains only one or no credible sources….Not written clearly or concisely. …Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. …Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Post: Timeliness
10 ptsExcellent

Posts main post by day 3

0 ptsPoor

Does not post by day 3

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response
18 to >16.02 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. …Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. …Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. …Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives….Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. ….Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. …Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16.02 to >14.22 ptsGood

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. …Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. …Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. …Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives….Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. ….Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. …Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14.22 to >12.42 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth….Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. …Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. …Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12.42 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth….Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. …Responses to faculty questions are missing. …No credible sources are cited.

18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response
17 to >15.13 ptsExcellent

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings….Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. …Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. …Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives….Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. ….Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. …Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15.13 to >13.43 ptsGood

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings….Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. …Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. …Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. …Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13.43 to >11.73 ptsFair

Response is on topic and may have some depth….Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. …Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. …. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11.73 to >0 ptsPoor

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth….Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. …Responses to faculty questions are missing. …No credible sources are cited.

17 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation
5 ptsExcellent

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 ptsPoor

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?