My Account

NURS 8100 Advocacy Area

NURS 8100 Advocacy Area

NURS 8100 Advocacy Area

African Americans (AAs) with chronic conditions are a vulnerable population, and they often face challenges accessing preventive, curative, and rehabilitative healthcare services due to racial and social injustice (Yearby, 2022). AAs are considered the least healthy ethnic group in the US. The purpose of this paper is to discuss an important advocacy issue related to this population and how the issue can be addressed through policy.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 8100 Advocacy Area
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Advocacy Issue

AAs face challenges with accessing preventive health services for chronic illnesses. Ellis et al. (2020) explain that AAs face high incidence rates and poor health outcomes for many common chronic illnesses, and many AA families are often concurrently managing multiple chronic diseases. Singh et al. (2023) found that AA communities have a higher risk and burden of chronic illnesses, including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and stroke, at a younger age than other ethnic groups.

The issue can be mitigated by enacting policies that foster preventive and screening services for AAs. Preventive health care is a proactive tactic to increase health care utilization. It comprises primary (health promotion and education), secondary (screenings and short-term treatment), and tertiary levels (long-term and rehabilitation treatment). According to Jordan et al. (2024), early detection and increased engagement with preventive health care have demonstrated an impact on morbidity and mortality rates among AA men. By increasing early detection of chronic illnesses and promoting better disease prognosis, preventive health care can reduce health disparities and increase the life expectancy of AAs with chronic illnesses.

Conclusion

AAs have a higher risk of chronic disease mortality and disability and experience chronic diseases younger than their White counterparts. The health disparity among AAs can be addressed through a policy approach of improving preventive health care to increase health care utilization. This can promote early detection and treatment and increase life expectancy for AAs with chronic illnesses.

References

Ellis, K. R., Hecht, H. K., Young, T. L., Oh, S., Thomas, S., Hoggard, L. S., Ali, Z., Olawale, R., Carthron, D., Corbie-Smith, G., & Eng, E. (2020). Chronic disease among African American families: A systematic scoping review. Preventing Chronic Disease, p. 17. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.190431

Jordan, H., Jeremiah, R., Watson, K., Corte, C., Steffen, A., & Matthews, A. K. (2024). Exploring Preventive Health Care Utilization Among Black/African American Men. American Journal of Men’s Health, 18(1), 15579883231225548. https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883231225548

Singh, H., Fulton, J., 4th, Mirzazada, S., Saragosa, M., Uleryk, E. M., & Nelson, M. L. A. (2023). Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Communities with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: Systematic Review Findings. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10(6), 2986–3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-022-01474-5

Yearby, R. (2022). The Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Health Justice. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 50(4), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.3

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

Advocacy Area

In the first two Discussions, you identified a vulnerable or marginalized population for whom you can determine an issue that could be addressed through engaging in policy advocacy. Now it is time to present this advocacy area with evidence to support and defend your selection.

For this Assignment, you will explain and defend your selected advocacy issue. Using evidence and experience, you will determine the advocacy issue most important to your practice and organization. Why are you selecting this issue? Why is this an area of high need? How might this area be improved with policy? What can you do to advocate for this area of need?

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Resources

Readings

  • Dawes, Daniel E. (2020). The political determinants of health. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Chapter 3, “The Political Determinants of Health Model” (pp. 41-77)

Media

 

To Prepare

  • Review resources associated with vulnerable or marginalized populations to determine an advocacy issue.
  • Consider which advocacy issue you find most important, and why.
  • Consider how policy might help to mitigate this need.

The Assignment: (1 page)

Select an issue you find most important, and then defend your position in a persuasive paper.

Submit a 1-page persuasive argument defending why you selected the advocacy issue to move forward with as your priority in this course.

Support—with evidence—why this advocacy issue is most important, and how it might be mitigated or eliminated through policy. Consider how this issue might set your policy agenda.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Walden Writing Center Sample Paper provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your Assignment.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NURS_8100_Week2_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8100_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelect an advocacy area you find most important.
40 to >35.0 ptsExcellent

The advocacy area selected is clearly appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as clearly appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

 35 to >31.0 ptsGood

The advocacy area selected is appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

 31 to >27.0 ptsFair

The advocacy area selected is vaguely appropriate to move forward throughout the course, as well as vaguely appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population.

 27 to >0 ptsPoor

The advocacy area selected is not appropriate to move forward throughout the course, or it is missing. The advocacy area selected is not appropriate for the identified marginalized or vulnerable population, or it is missing.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefend your position about the advocacy area selected.
45 to >40.0 ptsExcellent

The response comprehensively and clearly defends the advocacy selection. The response is persuasive and includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the selection.

 40 to >35.0 ptsGood

The response clearly defends the advocacy selection. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the selection.

 35 to >31.0 ptsFair

The response inaccurately or vaguely defends the advocacy selection. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the selection.

 31 to >0 ptsPoor

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not defend the advocacy selection, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support reflection, or it is selection.
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

 4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

 3 to >0 ptsPoor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation are used.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation, with no errors.

 4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

 3 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100

 











		


		
		
		
		
	


	
		
			


	


	









	

		

											
Open chat

						
				
				
			
										

			

			

									Dr.Nursingpapers
								

			

			

				

					
Hello
Can we help you?