NURS 8201 Week 4 Assignment: Frequency and Descriptive Statistics

NURS 8201 Week 4 Assignment: Frequency and Descriptive Statistics

Data collection and subsequent statistical analysis form an integral part of research and help researchers understand research aspects such as observed trends and interpretation of such trends to make meaning and draw conclusions. An example of important statistical analysis applied in the description of the dataset features is the frequency and descriptive statistics. Appropriate use of such statistical methods and strategies requires individuals to possess sufficient knowledge of data analysis and the right statistical tools to use in the analysis. For example, healthcare professionals can use the same to support clinical decisions, which is key to patient treatment and outcomes (Gray & Grove, 2021). As such, the purpose of this assignment is to explore the provided SPSS output and summarize the interpretation of the frequency data.

The Respondents’ Age

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NURS 8201 Week 4 Assignment: Frequency and Descriptive Statistics
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

This is one of the observations presented in the output. The total number of observations (N) made for this parameter is 1000, indicating adequacy in representing the data distribution, as 20 observations are usually the threshold of adequacy or sufficiency. Based on the respondents’ age, the maximum and the minimum values were observed to be 49.43 and 19.38, respectively. As part of the descriptive statistics, it is also important to include the mean (Mishra et al.,2019). Therefore, the mean age of the participants has been observed to be 36.64.  It is vital to explore the measure of variance in the output provided. The standard deviation of the participant’s age is 6.20, an observation which means that the majority of the observations are spread within the standard deviation of either side of the mean. It is also observable that the participants’ age is left screwed as indicated by the value, -0.374, an indication of slight left-skewness and that most of the values are on the left side of the histogram (Chattamvelli & Shanmugam, 2023)

Highest School Grade Completed

            The highest school grade completed is another parameter to explore. The total number of observations (N) for this parameter is 989. As in the previous case, the observations are sufficient as they are more than the threshold of twenty. The average grade attended by the participants is reflected in the mean. Therefore, the mean value for the highest grade completed is 11.28. It is also vital to explore the measure of variance such as standard deviation. As such the standard deviation for the highest grade completed is 1.56, showing a variability. Most of the observations made also spread within 0.75 standard deviations on either sides of the mean. Higher standard deviations usually indicate a bigger spread in the sampled data, while lower standard deviations reflect a lower spread in the sampled data (McGrath et al.,2020).

As observed, this data is also skewed to the left, with a value of -0.73 observed. This value is further supported by the shape of the obtained histogram, which shows that most of the values are on the left-hand side. The minimum and maximum values observed for the highest school grade completed are 1 and 16, respectively.

Family Income

            Family income is also among the data collected from the respondents, as such, this section explores its descriptive statistics. The total numbers of observations (N) recorded for family income is 895. As part of the description, it is important to explore minimum and maximum values. Therefore, the minimum and maximum family income recorded are 0 and $6,593, respectively. The mean value for the family income was observed to be $1,172.59. It is also vital to explore the measure of variance by looking at the standard deviation. From the output tables, the standard deviation is $26.34, which shows that there was variability in the family income category. The other measure is skewness. The skewness observed in the family income is  2.03, indicating that the family income data has a positive skewness and an indication of a positively skewed distribution (Orcan, 2020). The observation is also in line with the shape of the family income histogram, which shows that most of the observations can be found on the right side of the histogram.

Race and Ethnicity, and Currently Employed

            The next data parameters to be explored from the data output are race and ethnicity and current employment status. From the output tables. 80.3% of the respondents identified themselves as blacks, not Hispanic. 5.3 % identified themselves as whites, not Hispanics while 12.8% identified themselves as Hispanics. In addition, those who identified themselves as other races were 1.4%. Therefore, it can be conceived that the majority of the participants in this dataset were blacks, an indication that the data summary, observations, interpretations, and conclusions point more to what is happening in the black race.

It is also important to describe the employment status by exploring the percentage or number of those currently employed. From the provided data, the total number of observations made (N) was 546. Therefore, these are the numbers who revealed their employment status. 54.6 % of the participants indicated that they are currently not employed. On the other hand, the number of those in employment constituted 45.3%, which indicates a slight variation.

Conclusion

This assignment has focused on frequency and descriptive statistics with various data sets described. The respondents’ age and education level have been explored. Besides, the respondents’ income and ethnicity were also explored and described.

 

References

Chattamvelli, R., & Shanmugam, R. (2023). Skewness. In Descriptive Statistics for Scientists and Engineers: Applications in R (pp. 91-110). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-32330-0_4

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

McGrath, S., Zhao, X., Steele, R., Thombs, B. D., Benedetti, A., & DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. (2020). Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Statistical Methods In Medical Research29(9), 2520–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080

Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia22(1), 67-72. Doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education7(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Imagine that you have collected data from 100 patients. You have carefully compiled vitals, pain scores, and medications for each of the patients. However, what does all of this data mean? Is your work now done?

How do we make data meaningful? Why must we move beyond the raw data to ensure that data is purposeful?
Descriptive analysis is the analysis of the data to develop meaning. Descriptive analysis provides meaning through showing, describing, and summarizing the data compiled to “reveal characteristics of the sample and to describe study variables” (Gray & Grove, 2020). This allows the researcher to present data in a more meaningful and simplified way.

For this Assignment, summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided to you in the Week 4 Descriptive Statistics SPSS Output document. You will evaluate each variable in your analysis.

Reference: Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Week 4: Learning Resources

Required Readings

  • Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

 

To Prepare:

  • Review the Week 4 Descriptive Statistics SPSS Output provided in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Review the Learning Resources on how to interpret descriptive statistics, including how to interpret research outcomes.
  • Consider the results presented in the SPSS output and reflect on how you might interpret the frequency distributions and the descriptive statistics presented.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

  • Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month.
  • Note: A frequency analysis is way of summarizing data by depicting the number of times a data value occurs in the data table or output. It is used to analyze the data set including where the data are concentrated or clustered, the range of values, observation of extreme values, and to determine intervals for analysis that could make sense in categorizing your variable values.
  • Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month.
  • Note: The descriptive analysis includes N (size of your sample), the mean, the median, the standard deviation, the size and spread of your data to determine the variability/variance in your data.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632

Links to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NURS_8201_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_8201_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month.
35 to >31.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented…. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data…. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value…. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

31 to >27.0 ptsGood

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented…. The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data…. The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value…. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

27 to >24.0 ptsFair

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data…. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values…. An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague…. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

24 to >0 ptsPoor

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing…. An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing…. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month.
50 to >44.0 ptsExcellent

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. … The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

44 to >39.0 ptsGood

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided…. The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

39 to >34.0 ptsFair

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided…. The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

34 to >0 ptsPoor

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing…. The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?