NRNP-6635-8 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY 

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

To facilitate the provision of quality healthcare to patients, nurse practitioners need comprehensive insight into the factors that influence the development of psychopathology. Advancements in fields of biology such as neuroscience and genetics have helped healthcare providers better understand the etiology and pathophysiology of mental illnesses (Haywood et al., 2022). Diversity in function and structure of the brain among individuals has a significant impact on the occurrence of mental disorders. For example, individuals with anomalies in the secretion of neurotransmitters may be susceptible to the development of mental illnesses such as depression.In addition, human genetics has demonstrated that some mental disorders have patterns of inheritance. Identification of errors in specific genes has revealed the origin of illnesses such as bipolar disorder.

Psychology has also revealed that the occurrence of mental illnesses may be influenced by the patient’s behavior and cognitive functions. Moreover, how the patient copes with stress and the presence of emotional disorders predisposes the individual to more mental illnesses (Boland et al., 2022). Past events, such as stressful and traumatic experiences, also greatly influence the prevalence of mental diseases. The psychological state of the patient is pertinent in the diagnosis of a mental illness.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP-6635-8 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY 
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Different societies and cultures have diverse understandings of mental illnesses. The cultural background of the patient influences the clinical manifestation of the illness. Additionally, socio-cultural backgrounds influence the health-seeking behavior of a patient (Remes et al., 2021). Societies, where mental illnesses are stigmatized, will discourage patients from seeking help, while more informed societies will encourage individuals to seek healthcare for their mental wellbeing. Moreover, interpersonal factors such as personality types influence how an individual responds to a stressful situation and their ability to seek healthcare.

References

Boland, R. J., Verduin, M. L., Ruiz, P., Shah, A., & Sadock, B. J. (Eds.). (2022). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (Twelfth edition). Wolters Kluwer.

Haywood, D., Baughman, F. D., Mullan, B. A., & Heslop, K. R. (2022). What Accounts for the Factors of Psychopathology? An Investigation of the Neurocognitive Correlates of Internalising, Externalising, and the p-Factor. Brain Sciences, 12(4), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12040421

Remes, O., Mendes, J. F., & Templeton, P. (2021). Biological, Psychological, and Social Determinants of Depression: A Review of Recent Literature. Brain Sciences, 11(12), 1633. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121633

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

In many realms of medicine, objective diagnoses can be made: A clavicula is broken.  An infection is present. TSH levels meet the diagnostic criteria for hypothyroidism. Psychiatry, on the other hand, deals with psychological phenomena and behaviors. Can these, too, be “defined objectively and by scientific criteria (Gergen, 1985), or are they social constructions?” (Boland, Verduin, & Ruiz, 2022).

Thanks to myriad advances during recent decades, we know that psychopathology is caused by many interacting factors. Theoretical and clinical contributions to the field have come from the neural sciences, genetics, psychology, and social-cultural sciences. How do these factors impact the expression, classification, diagnosis, and prevalence of psychopathology, and why might it be important for a nurse practitioner to take a multidimensional, integrative approach?

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1

Explain the biological (genetic and neuroscientific); psychological (behavioral and cognitive processes, emotional, developmental); and social, cultural, and interpersonal factors that influence the development of psychopathology.

Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

 

PLEASE INCLUDE 3 CREDIBLE SOURCES

 

NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

NRNP_6635_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 to >39.0 pts

Excellent

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s). … Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

39 to >34.0 pts

Good

Responds to most of the discussion question(s). … Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least 3 credible references.

34 to >30.0 pts

Fair

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

30 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not respond to the discussion question(s). … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only 1 or no credible references.

44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Written clearly and concisely. … Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. … Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 to >4.0 pts

Good

Written concisely. … May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Written somewhat concisely. … May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Timely and full participation
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts main discussion by due date.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Posts main discussion by due date. … Meets requirements for full participation.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Posts main discussion by due date.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post main discussion by due date.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. … The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 pts

Good

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. … Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. … The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts

Excellent

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 pts

Good

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. … Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 pts

Poor

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

 

Open chat
Dr.Nursingpapers
Hello
Can we help you?